Posts: 1,422
Threads: 82
Likes Received: 784 in 496 posts
Likes Given: 323
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
35
06-02-2018, 09:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(06-02-2018, 07:03 PM)Awestruck Wrote: What annoys me the most is how personally some people take clan politics like this. It should all be in character, yet some people still get offended and take it too far.
There is no conspiracy. A lot of of things have stayed the same honestly compared to the last set of guidelines. Just very bad timing to have them released obviously. There was no intention of trying to "loophole".
Funny you say it should be kept IC, keeping it IC would have hurt lucky 7 so they did what they did OOC to change that.
Posts: 965
Threads: 109
Likes Received: 388 in 215 posts
Likes Given: 89
Joined: Jul 2015
Country:
06-03-2018, 01:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(06-02-2018, 07:03 PM)Awestruck Wrote: What annoys me the most is how personally some people take clan politics like this. It should all be in character, yet some people still get offended and take it too far.
There is no conspiracy. A lot of of things have stayed the same honestly compared to the last set of guidelines. Just very bad timing to have them released obviously. There was no intention of trying to "loophole".
The only reason it has gone OOC is because of a stupid rule that has been implenmented too defend Lucky.
Posts: 5,176
Threads: 150
Likes Received: 3,643 in 1,767 posts
Likes Given: 2,715
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
105
Country:
06-03-2018, 11:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
I can understand people's frustration with the new guidelines being added which has obviously caused some backlash, I did recommend introducing them after we sorted the Lucky 7 & Camorro situation but it was pushed ahead after the team had a discussion.
Just thinking in plain, real terms it's not really fair is it? Jan obviously you have the drive to shut down Lucky 7 which, with no disrespect would be a walk in the park for Camorro. Forgee is at the table handling bets with 3 customers and 10 Camorro members come in with rifles, shoot the place up, kill the VIP and they can't really fight back. It's not really a fighting clan, I believe many of you are driven to simply shut down Lucky 7 but aren't thinking in a logical sense.
In reality I don't think Grosvenors Casinos in real life keep a back stash of war equipment...
Posts: 4,613
Threads: 190
Likes Received: 6,123 in 2,144 posts
Likes Given: 824
Joined: Oct 2011
06-03-2018, 11:25 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
It’s not about what is fair, it’s about what is right. If you have the guts to trashtalk clans that are much bigger then you and even ignore the warnings then you should have the balls to face the consequences, and I can assure you, regardless of the outcome of this situation there will be huge consequences for Lucky 7.
And no, in reality casinos don’t have a stash of war equipment, but in real life casinos do not mess with the mafia, because if they do they know they are done for.
The following 11 users Like Jan's post:
• Lewwings, , Decay, Yonno, Eclipze, Santaliz, Random, Envy, Byra, Falc, General Rickets
06-03-2018, 11:29 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(06-03-2018, 11:15 AM)DVN Wrote: I can understand people's frustration with the new guidelines being added which has obviously caused some backlash, I did recommend introducing them after we sorted the Lucky 7 & Camorro situation but it was pushed ahead after the team had a discussion.
Just thinking in plain, real terms it's not really fair is it? Jan obviously you have the drive to shut down Lucky 7 which, with no disrespect would be a walk in the park for Camorro. Forgee is at the table handling bets with 3 customers and 10 Camorro members come in with rifles, shoot the place up, kill the VIP and they can't really fight back. It's not really a fighting clan, I believe many of you are driven to simply shut down Lucky 7 but aren't thinking in a logical sense.
In reality I don't think Grosvenors Casinos in real life keep a back stash of war equipment...
Lucky 7 has guards? I heard they're a force to be reckoned with!
This is why it's stupid. Forggee should know that before acting like a twat to Cammaro with one worded replies.
They should get what they deserve.
Posts: 3,343
Threads: 127
Likes Received: 1,245 in 653 posts
Likes Given: 712
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
76
Country:
06-03-2018, 11:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Objectively speaking, I found this article on Google.
So everything is possible as Jan specifies ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Monte...ino_attack
[Image: casino-1800.jpg]
Posts: 1,944
Threads: 205
Likes Received: 2,003 in 924 posts
Likes Given: 1,393
Joined: Aug 2014
Country:
06-03-2018, 11:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(06-03-2018, 11:15 AM)DVN Wrote: I can understand people's frustration with the new guidelines being added which has obviously caused some backlash, I did recommend introducing them after we sorted the Lucky 7 & Camorro situation but it was pushed ahead after the team had a discussion.
Just thinking in plain, real terms it's not really fair is it? Jan obviously you have the drive to shut down Lucky 7 which, with no disrespect would be a walk in the park for Camorro. Forgee is at the table handling bets with 3 customers and 10 Camorro members come in with rifles, shoot the place up, kill the VIP and they can't really fight back. It's not really a fighting clan, I believe many of you are driven to simply shut down Lucky 7 but aren't thinking in a logical sense.
In reality I don't think Grosvenors Casinos in real life keep a back stash of war equipment...
How is the way Forgee replied Camorro's fault? All he had to do was set up a little meeting and they could have came to an agreement, but instead he acted the way he acted and there's consequence for that. But then suddenly the rules changed in the middle of one of the first big conflicts in ages and prevented it from happening! Nobody can say that there wasn't any mischief going on here, Lucky 7 have pretty much tarnished their reputation OOC, but as those threads were IC the conflict should continue.
Imma lol with rickets too.
The following 1 user Likes JackZ's post:
• Byra
Posts: 1,506
Threads: 172
Likes Received: 690 in 368 posts
Likes Given: 739
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
56
Country:
06-03-2018, 11:47 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Right well my question is this.
If the new guidelines were not implemented to protect Lucky7, why wasn't the slightest bit of wit and sense used to think "Oh wait, this could affect the ongoing feud between Camorro and lucky 7, best we postpone those changes and let the situation play out!" ?
People start taking accountability for your own actions and not hiding behind someone else.
I also lol with rickets.
Posts: 5,372
Threads: 190
Likes Received: 3,551 in 1,917 posts
Likes Given: 1,335
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
96
06-03-2018, 02:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Typical Fearless.
Staff member has a passive clan so it will be protected no matter what, I’m not shocked.
We all know why Forgee was cocky on the thread now because he knew either or that he’s protected with his pathetic little clan.
Posts: 2,942
Threads: 267
Likes Received: 2,301 in 1,155 posts
Likes Given: 1,148
Joined: Nov 2015
06-03-2018, 02:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
The fruits have been given to the ally but they to do not take our gifts. This disrespect has been taken and our actions, due to our state of power, should've been expected. The children work hard for the fruits and therefore they should get their reward. The fruits are powerful.
|