Posts: 4,375
Threads: 180
Likes Received: 2,906 in 1,035 posts
Likes Given: 790
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
158
Country:
03-08-2016, 12:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Title of Suggestion: Adding a new rule to the UBR section
Description: As most of you know, there's this rule in the UBR section:
6. If no staff member replies on your unban request within 7 days, your request will always be in your advantage and your ban will be removed from your record.
My suggestion is to balance this, by making it a vice-versa thing. If the member who made the UBR fails to respond within 7 days after being replied to by a staff member, the UBR gets closed automatically.
Why: Sometimes even staff wait for several days without any response, which makes it unclear for us when we're allowed to close a UBR. This will balance both sides of a UBR discussion. As the one posting the UBR, you know how much time you have until you need to respond. And as a staff member, you know when you're allowed to close an unanswered UBR.
Posts: 605
Threads: 64
Likes Received: 744 in 272 posts
Likes Given: 397
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
11
Country:
03-08-2016, 12:36 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+Support however if this suggestion is approved then this one should be also ( http://fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=69335) as to balance out the field
Posts: 4,375
Threads: 180
Likes Received: 2,906 in 1,035 posts
Likes Given: 790
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
158
Country:
03-08-2016, 12:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(03-08-2016, 12:36 PM)Huskii Wrote: +Support however if this suggestion is approved then this one should be also (http://fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=69335) as to balance out the field
That suggestion is about Admin Abuse, which is irrelevant to this. But okay..?
Posts: 605
Threads: 64
Likes Received: 744 in 272 posts
Likes Given: 397
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation:
11
Country:
03-08-2016, 12:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(03-08-2016, 12:43 PM)Infernaw Wrote: (03-08-2016, 12:36 PM)Huskii Wrote: +Support however if this suggestion is approved then this one should be also (http://fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=69335) as to balance out the field
That suggestion is about Admin Abuse, which is irrelevant to this. But okay..?
I know it is about AA cases however, this suggestion is that if a player does not respond in 7 days the thread gets closed. The other suggestion is if an SA doesn't respond in 2 weeks to an AA case. Similar suggestions but for different parts of the court house.
Posts: 4,375
Threads: 180
Likes Received: 2,906 in 1,035 posts
Likes Given: 790
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
158
Country:
03-08-2016, 12:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(03-08-2016, 12:45 PM)Huskii Wrote: (03-08-2016, 12:43 PM)Infernaw Wrote: (03-08-2016, 12:36 PM)Huskii Wrote: +Support however if this suggestion is approved then this one should be also (http://fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=69335) as to balance out the field
That suggestion is about Admin Abuse, which is irrelevant to this. But okay..?
I know it is about AA cases however, this suggestion is that if a player does not respond in 7 days the thread gets closed. The other suggestion is if an SA doesn't respond in 2 weeks to an AA case. Similar suggestions but for different parts of the court house.
Feel free to read my response to that suggestion. Now please, stay on topic. This thread is about unban requests.
Keep in mind that having a 7 day limit before closing can also help the player, because the admin is not allowed to close an unreplied case earlier than after 7 days. It's a win-win thing.
Posts: 3,407
Threads: 68
Likes Received: 2,149 in 1,073 posts
Likes Given: 1,191
Joined: Aug 2014
Country:
03-08-2016, 01:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Don't see any issues with this, it's kind of already how we handle it anyway. This just makes it more official.
+Support.
Agorith
Fearless Moderator
Posts: 5,176
Threads: 150
Likes Received: 3,643 in 1,767 posts
Likes Given: 2,715
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
105
Country:
03-08-2016, 01:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+Support
I agree with this, it's only fair as both parties are treat with exactly the same rules.
Posts: 571
Threads: 71
Likes Received: 107 in 88 posts
Likes Given: 441
Joined: Sep 2015
Country:
03-08-2016, 01:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+Support
Posts: 3,867
Threads: 240
Likes Received: 2,141 in 1,173 posts
Likes Given: 1,177
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation:
25
Country:
03-08-2016, 01:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
-Support
Players cannot be expected to know when a staff member is going to reply to them to constantly check their UBR.
I would support this if the player was to receive a forum PM, or a steam message to so it is in limbo. As quite often UBR's can get lost when the forum is in a mess. Or they can be missed by the player.
Also in retaliation someone might reply that staff members shouldn't be expected to reply to one in 7 days....but yes, yes they should given the size of the team and they are aware of the role they take on and what it involves.
Posts: 4,375
Threads: 180
Likes Received: 2,906 in 1,035 posts
Likes Given: 790
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
158
Country:
03-08-2016, 02:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(03-08-2016, 01:48 PM)Marty Wrote: -Support
Players cannot be expected to know when a staff member is going to reply to them to constantly check their UBR.
I would support this if the player was to receive a forum PM, or a steam message to so it is in limbo. As quite often UBR's can get lost when the forum is in a mess. Or they can be missed by the player.
Also in retaliation someone might reply that staff members shouldn't be expected to reply to one in 7 days....but yes, yes they should given the size of the team and they are aware of the role they take on and what it involves.
FYI: Staff are not notified about it either.
Users can easily monitor their threads through the User CP menu, and even toggle e-mail notifications if that would be the case.
|