Posts: 2,350
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 2,489 in 1,061 posts
Likes Given: 612
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
45
05-07-2018, 07:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.
After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.
Regards,
Thanks to Envy for the signature.
Posts: 5,103
Threads: 237
Likes Received: 3,608 in 1,515 posts
Likes Given: 2,992
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
69
Country:
05-07-2018, 07:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(05-07-2018, 07:20 PM)JackZ Wrote: Wait so according to the statistics, Pines will be even more laggy than v5p? Hoooollllyyyyyy
Where does it show that? I mean the FPS you will get on the map completely depends on how it was optimised. There is no way for us to find this out without decompiling it and finding out where the brushes are. We also have no idea how the gamemode will treat v2d_sexy and pines. For those who will say "We used to have V2D so we must know what the FPS is", the map had to have been decompiled for it to be edited. During this process, a lot of things including optimisation by the original creator can be lost. As such we do not know if the map editor re-optimised it well or not.
Pollux
Fearless Management
__________________________________________________________________
Posts: 5,103
Threads: 237
Likes Received: 3,608 in 1,515 posts
Likes Given: 2,992
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
69
Country:
05-07-2018, 07:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.
After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.
Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)
Pollux
Fearless Management
__________________________________________________________________
Posts: 2,350
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 2,489 in 1,061 posts
Likes Given: 612
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation:
45
05-07-2018, 07:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(05-07-2018, 07:30 PM)Pollux Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.
After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.
Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)
Yeah, I've stated this in my previous posts on this thread which got buried:
"I feel like this whole "V5P is shit" issue would never have been an issue if the gamemode was actually more optimized. I wholeheartedly agree with Nevy that V4B1 and V5P would be completely superior maps if we would be able to get better FPS.
Why not attempt to tackle the elephant in the room and just attempt to provide us with better FPS by optimizing the gamemode, rather than doing this trial and error with a new map that has a clear split in votes, leaving almost 50% of the community unsatisfied with a map change."
Regards,
Thanks to Envy for the signature.
Posts: 1,422
Threads: 82
Likes Received: 784 in 496 posts
Likes Given: 323
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
35
05-07-2018, 07:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(05-07-2018, 07:35 PM)Yonno Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:30 PM)Pollux Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.
After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.
Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)
Yeah, I've stated this in my previous posts on this thread which got buried:
"I feel like this whole "V5P is shit" issue would never have been an issue if the gamemode was actually more optimized. I wholeheartedly agree with Nevy that V4B1 and V5P would be completely superior maps if we would be able to get better FPS.
Why not attempt to tackle the elephant in the room and just attempt to provide us with better FPS by optimizing the gamemode, rather than doing this trial and error with a new map that has a clear split in votes, leaving almost 50% of the community unsatisfied with a map change."
In my opinion its too big for what it has to offer. It looks spot on the map is is very good to look at but it just doesnt function like v2d.
In v2d you would have countless people chatting at bank, all the shops and stores and roleplays within the city almost linking together, like one could be a bar roleplay and you go there for a drink or whatever and then you could go to a different roleplay.
Everything just functioned and flowed on v2d for whatever reason. However, its hasnt on the current map.
Posts: 5,103
Threads: 237
Likes Received: 3,608 in 1,515 posts
Likes Given: 2,992
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
69
Country:
05-07-2018, 07:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(05-07-2018, 07:42 PM)perqe Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:35 PM)Yonno Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:30 PM)Pollux Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.
After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.
Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)
Yeah, I've stated this in my previous posts on this thread which got buried:
"I feel like this whole "V5P is shit" issue would never have been an issue if the gamemode was actually more optimized. I wholeheartedly agree with Nevy that V4B1 and V5P would be completely superior maps if we would be able to get better FPS.
Why not attempt to tackle the elephant in the room and just attempt to provide us with better FPS by optimizing the gamemode, rather than doing this trial and error with a new map that has a clear split in votes, leaving almost 50% of the community unsatisfied with a map change."
In my opinion its too big for what it has to offer. It looks spot on the map is is very good to look at but it just doesnt function like v2d.
In v2d you would have countless people chatting at bank, all the shops and stores and roleplays within the city almost linking together, like one could be a bar roleplay and you go there for a drink or whatever and then you could go to a different roleplay.
Everything just functioned and flowed on v2d for whatever reason. However, its hasnt on the current map.
I don't think this is due to the map, rather due to the playerbase.
Pollux
Fearless Management
__________________________________________________________________
05-07-2018, 08:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Got probably around 4/5 messages saying "Vote V2D sexy", hahaha proper marketing.
Hope for the best one, in the end, the one that makes the player base united.
Posts: 1,422
Threads: 82
Likes Received: 784 in 496 posts
Likes Given: 323
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
35
05-07-2018, 08:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(05-07-2018, 07:43 PM)Pollux Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:42 PM)perqe Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:35 PM)Yonno Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:30 PM)Pollux Wrote: (05-07-2018, 07:23 PM)Yonno Wrote: I personally feel like both V2D "sexy" and Pines are shit compared to V4B1 and V5P.
After also having played both maps on applejack with around 60 fps (with an i7 4790k, GTX 980TI and 16GB of RAM) with 5 players I'm worried that FPS will not be much better on V2D sexy nor Pines compared to V5P.
Honestly FPS shouldn't be too much of a factor between these two maps. Both maps will have poor FPS and that is fully down to the gamemode. Unless you guys want to play on flatgrass the map won't have much of an effect (most large maps are optimised well as they kinda have to)
Yeah, I've stated this in my previous posts on this thread which got buried:
"I feel like this whole "V5P is shit" issue would never have been an issue if the gamemode was actually more optimized. I wholeheartedly agree with Nevy that V4B1 and V5P would be completely superior maps if we would be able to get better FPS.
Why not attempt to tackle the elephant in the room and just attempt to provide us with better FPS by optimizing the gamemode, rather than doing this trial and error with a new map that has a clear split in votes, leaving almost 50% of the community unsatisfied with a map change."
In my opinion its too big for what it has to offer. It looks spot on the map is is very good to look at but it just doesnt function like v2d.
In v2d you would have countless people chatting at bank, all the shops and stores and roleplays within the city almost linking together, like one could be a bar roleplay and you go there for a drink or whatever and then you could go to a different roleplay.
Everything just functioned and flowed on v2d for whatever reason. However, its hasnt on the current map.
I don't think this is due to the map, rather due to the playerbase.
Both the map is one of the reasons why the playerbase is shit, so take what you want from that.
Posts: 1,928
Threads: 193
Likes Received: 974 in 539 posts
Likes Given: 559
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
29
Country:
05-07-2018, 08:24 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(05-07-2018, 08:10 PM)Kevin Ramsey Wrote: Got probably around 4/5 messages saying "Vote V2D sexy", hahaha proper marketing.
Hope for the best one, in the end, the one that makes the player base united.
But did you vote for V2D sexy?
Posts: 3,343
Threads: 127
Likes Received: 1,245 in 653 posts
Likes Given: 712
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation:
76
Country:
05-07-2018, 08:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Based on real situation when you get spammed to vote v2d
|