Make Homophobia Against the Rules
PhantomSolaris Away
Quit Fearless
***
Posts: 499
Threads: 53
Likes Received: 225 in 149 posts
Likes Given: 653
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 17
Country: England
#21
02-06-2016, 12:18 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
-Support

Already in the rules, I should know because I got a ban with that reason. (I wasn't actually homophobic but oh well.) Pretty sure as explained above, it comes under discrimination.
[Image: WWhqdJO.gif]
                                      +Rep me!
Find
butilka4 Offline
New Member
*
Posts: 4
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 1
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation: 0
#22
02-07-2016, 08:01 AM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
Even if it isn't exactly discriminating, it's sexist - In any case of you looking at the rules, it's there.

-Support, Not Needed
Find
Danny Boy Offline
Senior Member
****
Posts: 762
Threads: 62
Likes Received: 477 in 268 posts
Likes Given: 565
Joined: May 2015
Reputation: 42
Country: United Kingdom
#23
02-07-2016, 10:06 AM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
+Support

Find
Link Offline
Do it.
******
Veteran - Administrator
Posts: 1,490
Threads: 125
Likes Received: 2,559 in 635 posts
Likes Given: 2,666
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 76
Country: United Kingdom
#24
02-07-2016, 07:10 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
(02-06-2016, 12:18 PM)sonicsimon Wrote: -Support

Already in the rules, I should know because I got a ban with that reason. (I wasn't actually homophobic but oh well.) Pretty sure as explained above, it comes under discrimination.

Yes, but the reason for this post is clarity. It is common acceptance and interpretation that homophobia classes under discrimination, however factually it is not, as I have already stated clearly in the OP. Many people role with it because of informational social influence.

I don't understand why people are - supporting this thread with the reason 'it is already there', because frankly, it's not. It may be there in modern interpretation, but loopholes should always be filled. Take my original suggestion for example - if you feel it's already there, why don't you make it 100% crystal clear to everyone that EVERY type of prejudice and discrimination is against the rules. Obviously, imbeciles like me do not understand this sacred society we live in, so make us... please.
Kind Regards,
Link
Veteran

The following 1 user Likes Link's post:
  • Pear
Find
mgdwszx Offline
One of the Elders
*****
Posts: 1,271
Threads: 76
Likes Received: 537 in 346 posts
Likes Given: 1,178
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 25
#25
02-08-2016, 07:44 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
+Support
[Image: XDVtdgY.gif]
Find
Tomo Offline
hello
******
Veteran - Management+
Posts: 5,749
Threads: 369
Likes Received: 5,177 in 1,695 posts
Likes Given: 2,920
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 92
Country: United Kingdom
#26
03-06-2016, 11:02 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
Implemented in the new rules.

Moved.
[Image: tgRQtsH.png]
Find


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
Contact Us | Fearless Forums | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication