Posts: 3,434
Threads: 68
Likes Received: 2,158 in 1,079 posts
Likes Given: 1,200
Joined: Aug 2014
Country:
11-01-2018, 05:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Title of suggestion:
Remove/alter the way voice channels work
Description:
There's multiple options to consider here:
- The discord bot could be coded so that it can create a temporary voice channel for you, removing itself once everyone has left it.
- Simply remove all user & staff created personal voice channels and stick to public voice channels.
- The server provides us with a certain amount of public voice channels, onto which you can temporarily claim ownership over the channel.
Thus being able to lock/unlock the channel, etc.. Basically giving you full ownership until you leave it.
Why:
Because as it stands now, voice channels are only very rarely being used.
Posts: 6,566
Threads: 272
Likes Received: 5,892 in 1,975 posts
Likes Given: 2,820
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
211
Country:
11-01-2018, 05:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Just for the record I cannot guarantee I can get temporary channels working.
Posts: 3,537
Threads: 312
Likes Received: 1,613 in 841 posts
Likes Given: 1,733
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation:
76
Country:
11-01-2018, 05:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+support for option one, if it's possible to code something like that.
From what I've seen from doing channel purges, most channels get removed and only about half or 1/3 of channels that people wish to keep are actually used often, so there are a lot of channels that aren't being used. Also, people request channels that they abandon after a while or never actually use. It's hard to keep track of this as well, as there are no channel logs to check if a certain channel has been used or not.
Posts: 1,487
Threads: 117
Likes Received: 929 in 566 posts
Likes Given: 1,828
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation:
27
Country:
11-01-2018, 05:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+support
Posts: 3,434
Threads: 68
Likes Received: 2,158 in 1,079 posts
Likes Given: 1,200
Joined: Aug 2014
Country:
11-01-2018, 05:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(11-01-2018, 05:26 PM)TheSiphon Wrote: +support for option one, if it's possible to code something like that.
From what I've seen from doing channel purges, most channels get removed and only about half or 1/3 of channels that people wish to keep are actually used often, so there are a lot of channels that aren't being used. Also, people request channels that they abandon after a while or never actually use. It's hard to keep track of this as well, as there are no channel logs to check if a certain channel has been used or not.
It's been my personal experience the [Keep] system isn't as effective as it should be, this was already the case back in 2016 when I tried this method, this all due to the nature of people wanting to keep their channels regardless of whether or not they actually use it.
I don't see that changing anytime soon or ever for that matter.
Something needs to be done about it regardless.
Posts: 1,307
Threads: 41
Likes Received: 1,040 in 483 posts
Likes Given: 834
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
38
Country:
11-01-2018, 05:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
-support why is it a problem, there is no harm in keeping them
Posts: 5,026
Threads: 224
Likes Received: 3,513 in 1,483 posts
Likes Given: 2,964
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation:
69
Country:
11-01-2018, 05:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+support
Pollux
Fearless Management
bork
__________________________________________________________________
Posts: 3,434
Threads: 68
Likes Received: 2,158 in 1,079 posts
Likes Given: 1,200
Joined: Aug 2014
Country:
11-01-2018, 10:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(11-01-2018, 05:39 PM)Coffee Wrote: -support why is it a problem, there is no harm in keeping them
That's just a lazy attitude.
There's no harm in alot of things, thus you shouldn't try to improve upon them?
I hope you realise that's exactly what you're saying.
Posts: 663
Threads: 46
Likes Received: 217 in 156 posts
Likes Given: 129
Joined: Apr 2013
Country:
11-02-2018, 12:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
+support would be a great feature if this was added, it kinda cleans up discord as well for option 1
Posts: 787
Threads: 77
Likes Received: 399 in 261 posts
Likes Given: 429
Joined: Mar 2018
Country:
11-02-2018, 10:06 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Neutral, I think the customisablilty is cool with the current custom channels and that’s what I think most people like about them! So unless with the bot it makes the channel and you then have full permissions over it then I will lean more towards a + but I’m currently still neutral. The channels that are there and then when someone joins and it becomes their own would be quite hard imo due to having to make the bot look at the channels 24/7 waiting for someone to leave and join is quite frankly pointless.
If anything happens I think it would most likely be the commanded temp channels with full perms over it.
|