05-22-2018, 06:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
I understand where you're coming from. The problem I had with the signature was that it was a GIF with a clear thrusting motion which clearly does suggest pornography and seems to be more of a loopwhole rather than a funny signature.
Dobby's signature is comedic, the woman is fully clothed as is Dobby and the whole idea is for it to be funny, maybe he's just getting a dance from her. There is still no real pornographic references there, and you can think what you want but it's a matter of opinion. Yours was more serious and clearly more close to being pornographic than Dobby's.
Dobby's signature is comedic, the woman is fully clothed as is Dobby and the whole idea is for it to be funny, maybe he's just getting a dance from her. There is still no real pornographic references there, and you can think what you want but it's a matter of opinion. Yours was more serious and clearly more close to being pornographic than Dobby's.