SoulRipper | Agorith
#1
Name:  GHOSTK1LL3R | Greed

Time/Date: 06-08-2016, around 18:30?

Steam ID:

Name of Administrator: [FL] Agorith [STEAM_0:0:43023747], [FL] SoulRipper [STEAM_0:1:15472195]


The write up of this case will be spear-headed by GHOSTK1LL3R with myself jolting parts down in comparison of area’s I have deemed necessary. If any evidence or statements would like to be brought forward to myself, GHOSTK1LL3R feel free to contact me through my Steam account. I will keep statements, evidence brought up anonymous to the point of taking a permanent ban to make sure your identity is kept hidden if you request it.

Evidence:
All evidence in reference to this case come from the following threads:
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php...#pid610309
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=73819

I would like to originally state the reasoning of why I am making a claim against the owner of Fearless(SoulRipper). I the plaintiff feel that there has been blatant bias in the ruling of Agorith’s admin abuse cases which is something that wouldn’t have occurred for any other staff member. Due to this; I’d request that SoulRipper doesn’t one man army this admin abuse case like he did with the others and make a statement without consulting with SA’s prior. I understand you are the owner of Fearless and everything to do with it. However, there is a line which you mustn’t and cannot cross. For if you are to do this why can people trust you SoulRipper to hold your word.
I am here as a means to acquire justice that should have delivered originally.
I would equally like to state that this admin abuse case is not a carbon copy of those that has already been pasted and is being written up in fresh so please read every statement made. Equally, I state this for the reason that this admin abuse case shouldn’t be denied on the terms of ‘Has already been dealt with’ as I am going to be addressing points which haven’t been concluded due to statements from the defendant SoulRipper.

Agorith breach of TOS 1.12
I will now be in reference to the bulletpoint 4 of this TOS.
use or attempt to use any unauthorized means to modify, reroute, or gain access to the Services;
This breach of TOS has been presented through the following video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbIh9QWzz7w
At the end of the video you can see how Agorith gained access to molotovs through an unauthorized mean to the services to allow himself to exploit and bypass the procedure to buy molotov’s. This is equally an infraction of the server rule 1.1 which is abusing a ‘gltich’. I would like to present a present case in hand were a player received a punishment of 8 months due to exploiting with the use of buttons to access a higher prop count. This is in contest similar to what Agorith has done as he has bypass the limitations to allow him access to items on the market without the ability of purchasing them.
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php...HOSTK1LL3R
Agorith breach of Server Rules 2.5| 16.6 | 9.4a

The rules in reference have been quoted below to make it easier for the reader to follow.
2.5 Do not do unrealistic things out of context (FailRP). This includes things such as anti-gravity bathtubs, unrealistic car colors, watermelon fights, etc. when there is no specific roleplay in which they would make sense (i.e. game shows or science roleplays).
Agorith has been found to be in direct violation of this rule in the subsequent video at the very beginning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbIh9QWzz7w
I have addition evidence of the accused Agorith altering his model to unrealistic zombie models if required I am more than happy to upload if requested.
16.6 Do not FailRP. Car thieves need chop-shops, and burglars need places to store their stolen goods. Proper background RP draws the line between crime and rule-breaking.
Agorith has been found to be in direct violation of this rule also. Agorith had no proper background RP set-up when doing the zombie models. There was no server event as background up; there was no incident that required a zombie model either. The accused merely did the model as party trick. This rule is found in the Crime section; however, this rule would be correct to be in comparison of what Agorith has done as it would be FailRP for him to be performing this ‘RP’ without a valid background reason.
9.4a Do not set your job as an animal, this is considered FailRP.
As shown from this rule, it is fair to assume that it is equally FailRP for an admin to change their model to a ‘zombie’ which can be classed as an animal.
Direct quote of what an animal is from the search browser Google(https://www.google.com/search?biw=1042&b...-rdZlI4SZ4):
 
a living organism that feeds on organic matter, typically having specialized sense organs and nervous system and able to respond rapidly to stimuli.

Agorith breach of admin abuse rule ‘Using noclip or teleport to avoid RP situation…’
Rule broke and found of violation of Agorith can be found from the thread:
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=63609
From the following video you can notice how Agorith comes out of no-where bypassing the keypad and defences set-up on purpose to stop people from freely entering our base of operations.
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=73819
I can if requested upload the whole video of this point if requested. I will only upload for the following users: Infernaw,SnowerdWolf,Avgar,SoulRipper.

SoulRipper Lying in the courthouse
The quotes will be in reference to the following thread: http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=73834&page=2
As stated clearly in the original thread ‘Video provided by another person, I will deliver the unedited video if Avgar or Infernaw requests it’. However, SoulRipper while closing this thread with an official statement states ‘The prosecutor does not want to show an unedited video of the case which is deemed necessary’. As stated at the beginning of the thread, I will get the unedited video if requested. Equally, I’d like to know the reasoning of why this video is insufficient evidence as stated by both Agorith and SoulRipper.
Equally, I’d like to mention how this isn’t a Agorith vs Greed argument as there is legitimate evidence from the plaintiff Greed(Myself) through the use of the logs to present my argument and also through the video presented.
Additionally, SoulRipper you state’ This seems to be a small detail. ‘Small detail or not; rules are rules. Agorith has lied blatantly in the courthouse thinking he is better than anyone else or maybe he is in the mindset similar to SoulRipper of he ‘has been punished enough’ thinking he can get away with this abuse.

SoulRipper stating that ‘Agorith has had enough’ isn’t sufficient to close down a case of an administrator lying
This will be in reference to the following case and in reference to the closing notes.
Agorith has been punished for his other admin abuse thread. I think he's been punished enough.’
I don’t understand how because Agorith has been punished in his other admin abuse thread has any links to this case. This case is independent and has no correlation or links to what Agorith was found in violation on the other thread. Equally, I fail to see how Agorith has been ‘punished enough’ with a 1 week removal from administrator only on the servers. If a player was to be found spawning in molotovs without paying for them he’d be removed from the services of Fearless effective immediately.

Agorith’s direct lying in the courthouse
This will be directly touching on the following case and unban request: http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=73834
http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=73830
Agorith’s opening statement on the unban request was the following:
You followed him around to Empire Hotels, where you found him arresting a gundealer.’
As presented from the following video we can see how Agorith has lied in this unban request as Greed(Myself) had no followed ForceGhost into the video.

SoulRipper direct bias towards Agorith
My last point that I’d like to state is how SoulRipper only reviewed those admin abuse cases which were against Agorith. I felt this part was obvious considering there was 2 other admin abuse cases that were pending and had been up there for a few weeks now. However, the ones that he had conceded were still being discussed and had recently had replies posted.
 
I feel the treatment that Agorith has received has been unjust; unfair and down right bias. I feel Agorith has gotten off very lighty due to the fact SoulRipper has stepped in.
Soul, you may think Agorith is a ‘good’ person and this is his first admin abuse case so you should cut him some slack. But what is to say that he’ll not do this again? What’s to say he won’t drink again and do the same actions? I feel Agorith begged you to reply as he knew he’d lose his rank if you did not.
-         Ghost
#2
Duplicate, closed.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)