Report: ÛžM.R.T.K.Ûž

[Sauce]

Name of player: ۞M.R.T.K.۞


SteamID: STEAM_0:1:52355093

Time in GMT: 17:00 ish.

Server: v2d

Summary: Placed and invisible prop in the road, deleted it straight after. The recording shows him placing it before invisible.

Evidence:

[beflok]

Please post more evidence within 24 hours. There is no evidence linking this player to the invisible prop.

[dig]

Request reviewed and denied.

Closing notes:
Insufficient evidence of any rules being violated by accused player (۞M.R.T.K.۞, STEAM_0:1:52355093 ) .
Please note, please provide as much evidence as possible in the future.

[FL] Diggy
Server Administrative Team

[dig]

Case Re-opened.

[Sauce]

To pinpoint that it was him shown in the first recording I have this:
[Image: a084fc096063b9fdbba9b84375e38cc0.png]


I have gone over the whole recording a few times, and apart from what I uploaded nothing else will shine to light any more evidence, however I think if you look carefully the submitted recording is definitely suitable evidence.

But however, I will describe the recording to bring to light the proof in it:

• In the first one second you will note him placing the prop on the road, this is as I drove past the first time.
  
• After this I had driven back to the lake and then was on my way back. I did not think anything of him placing a prop there other than he was building his house and I didn't presume he would be leaving it there and then making it invisible.
  
• Around 0:03 you can see me driving my car back towards the city, at which point I crash into his frozen prop that he had placed earlier.
  
• Note that he runs backwards as I am about to drive past, he is fully aware of what is going to happen, I presume he was planning to kill me but instead it only chipped my car.
  
• After I had crashed into it, I had realized why he had the prop there. This is clearly a plan to try and blow up some cars as they crash into the prop.
  

I hope that by describing the evidence it should be sufficient to bring to light the rule break.

Thanks.

[Preditor]

Denied.

Insufficient evidence against the accused player.

Closing notes: After going over the evidence, and the points in which you directed it is not enough to prove that he did it. Yes he is fumbling with a prop in the beginning of the video, but then it just cuts to you hitting something. It has no solid proof that he was involved with it.