Posts: 6
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
0
12-02-2012, 11:53 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:01 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Post reason: Supplying context deliberately and maliciously left out by the poster
Context: The door in question was a door that for some reason, while helping to build the large rebel base that the original poster has carefully avoided showing. Since I could not buy the doors normally, I simply shut them and built an invisible prop in front of the door (which was incorporated in the base area), in order to avoid using a large and ugly visible plank in the way of the base. Since then, possibly while I was building on the opposite sides, someone must have entered the base, and opened one of the doors, creating the scene from outside.
Since the fact that someone was already basing here was clearly visible from the chain-link fences to the left and large arrow showing the actual entrance to the right. (if you look carefully you can see he has neglected to crop the edge of it out). Either someone else left the door open for some reason, or he climbed the base fence, went inside and opened it before returning to take this photo. Either way, whether he set up the shot or merely took advantage of it, there was NO way in which he could not have known that someone was clearly already using it.
EDIT: Since it was posted I overheard him talking about the ban request he posted for me, and confronted him,giving him a full explanation of exactly why I had deemed it necessary to place a prop with 1% transparency in that location. As a result, you can see the short and hastily written sentence amending the statement but quickly retreating to a defensive phrasing
Posts: 6
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
0
12-02-2012, 11:58 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:01 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
No, you clearly knew that someone was basing there, and that it was probably just to remedy a fault with he door - as you can see even in your screenshot, you didn't quite manage to avoid taking in some of the clearly visible base that would have been visible from any other angle whatsoever.
Posts: 6
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
0
12-02-2012, 01:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:01 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
But they were not the front doors. they were SUPPOSED to be sealed off barriers. Someone had dicked around with the base, however.
Posts: 5,609
Threads: 114
Likes Received: 1,676 in 945 posts
Likes Given: 351
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation:
110
12-02-2012, 02:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:01 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Request reviewed and approved.
Closing notes:
Evidence was deemed sufficient, accused player The Dorsi Dwarf (STEAM_0:0:42104565) was found violating rules regarding prop usage.
Suspension shall be applied for 1 day.
[FL] Adman
Trial Administrator
Server Administrative Team