server state v34

[Baskingner]

Using that logic if a dev said "I need to test money, here you go lads" and gives the entire contributor team $9,999,999 its okay because the dev's think they should have it sooo. You're way to trusting of the staff team. I'd also prefer you not call me darling when you are trying to grasp at a point because it really devalues any drivel you try to express to me.

As for it being an incentive for staff to join, that is a really weak argument. The staff should have to be coerced onto the server to do what they themselves volunteered to do? Lmfao, if that's the case they all need demoting and replacing.

That comparrison is really stupid as testing cars that they cannot earn money from isn't really the same as needing test money. There wouldn't be a reason for them to have test money because nothing needs to be tested with it. The cars however do need to be tested.
It's not an argument, more a suggestion. It shouldn't be but could be seen as an incentive. We also have had the discussion of staff being inactive and needing to be replaced or to hire new staff however no changes have happened aside staff becoming a little more active recently. Despite the slight increase in staff activity, there still needs to be more staff hired. But that's not what this discussion is really about.

They can't earn money from it but isn't FL about roleplaying? They had exclusive vehicles that only they had which no other player could obtain at the time, and as far as I'm aware they roleplayed with them which would mean they're being given benefits and specialties for roleplay. Are you being paid by the staff or something or are you volunteering to defend them at every turn?

I could ask the same of you Killroy, are you being paid to attack FL and its development at every turn? All ive seen from you is complaining, being offended and attacking other members with lowblow memes. If you are unable to do the same roleplay as the staffmembers did with that car you are shit at RPing or have poor imagination skills, or both.

The test car for the staffteam was a poor decision, agreed, but youre exaggerating a lot. Im not a fan of giving staffmembers benefits over other members as im a firm believer in that the gap between staff and non staff should be as small as possible. That doesnt mean there shouldnt be any differences at all though and i feel youre complaining at every chance you get.