Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
03-24-2021, 06:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
1) I can’t recall exactly what I said when you asked it to be taken down because of it being a public area but I’m certain that I didn’t directly say nor imply that I won’t be taking the gate down at all. Regarding the “losers” comment this was said however, it was a response to the arrogant vibe, demanding it to be taken down instantly (If I could have read the rules for myself I would of made alterations to the area so it wouldn’t conflict with the new rules however you didn’t give me that opportunity) as soon as you came up to the top floor. You also threatened me and the group with being banned and then proceeded to laugh about it walking down the stairs also stating that when the admin comes and removes the gate in 30mins (which they never did, nice threat btw) you would come back and kill us.
2) “You were being raided for contraband, which you DID have.” Yes this is true that we had contra, you decided to raid almost instantaneously after the confrontation however, “you refused to remove the base and started the insults” is partially incorrect, as I said I’m certain that I never directly said nor implied that I won’t be removing the base under any circumstance as I wanted to check for myself if the rule you stated was correct but before I got the opportunity you walked back up the stairs and started to raid, the insults I said however were a result of the cocky attitude you gave off- which I believed might of rubbed me the wrong way a bit too much.
[18:22]
3) The claim “after you provoked us” again is incorrect after the ordeal at the apartments finished you or one of your associates were the first people to type in ooc about the situation calling us pussies and losers (which you said you did) – “so if we call you pussies and losers (not virgins) in OOC”. The response I gave was sarcastic as you literally gained nothing from the raid as the printers were destroyed, which is factual. “YOU started being hostile when we were simply warning you about the rules” I might have come across hostile in this situation however again this was due to the cocky attitude YOU gave when being face to face with me through a transparent part of the gate. You then later stated “I suggested destroying your contraband was questionable, not against the rules” Yes this is true it is our contra and destroying it is allowed however, the way it was worded in ooc by either you or someone else came across like it was against the rules.
4) “it has an overly unfair advantage to the defenders (e.g. one way props, tight corriders with firing holes, no cover for keypads etc)”. Firstly, there was no unfair advantage to the base which you only saw when you raided the top floor might I add- as you are clearly able to shoot our heads and torso from either side of shooting section which then invalidates the claim “Having unfair shooting angles (with only the head visible) is unfair.” Secondly, we didn’t even retaliate when you raided so the claim again in invalid as the so-called “unfair shooting angles” weren’t utilised.
[18:22]
5) “give their usernames instead of getting in the way and hiding their names” I’m not getting in the way I’m simply referring to the mandem how you did. “Their bodies were found in the bedroom area of your bluefin suite. They suicded (or killed eachother) without use of the balcony. If this was someone else's body you should probably say who and why now.” These bodies you found were from previous Corleone members which decided to raid us when we were under the “rebel” job role. “Jumping off a 5 story building was obviously suicide” elaborate please which rule was broken in the suicide incident, as my friends tried to edge off the balcony, hoping to catch themselves on a lower floor, this failed and they unfortunately died, this was not intentional.
6) “ If you are going to start the old 'he's broken the rules so I shouldn't be banned for the rules I broke' nonsense, make a PR” that was not my intent with that claim I was trying to point out how potentially YOU but definitely someone from your clan seem to protrude around the map thinking you can RDM and hostage without consequences- which is being shown in another PR.
[18:22]
7) “The raid was 7 minutes long” I don’t recall the exact duration of the event entirely however it was definitely more than 7 mins long. “Chechen is struggling to sort out the video so it will probably be done later” I’m not sure how this is possible as retrieving a short video of 7mins usually doesn’t take this long as its unedited footage of the entire event and what followed right? “Your crying in OOC lasted 20 minutes after that” I mean if you are calling us receiving consistent abuse and mockery after the raid finished crying then I suggest you pick up a dictionary for £6.55 in WHSmith.
“There are lots showing how your friends died (and who they were)” then I’m not sure why you are asking for the names if the intel you have already displays this information, making the question earlier redundant. “There are logs showing your messages in OOC.” Yeah there should be, it should also show the things you were bellowing out for no apparent reason, hopefully this will make you realise that you aren’t a goody too shoes and are all innocent which you seem to be implying. “'b-b-but he was nasty toooo” btw no one said this lol.
“honest truth is that if you weren't so a prick during and after the whole situation I wouldn't have even given you a second thought, let alone made a PR on you. But when someone as proud of arrogant as you decides to throw around their own insecurities as insults to distract from their rule-breaking and then brag about it and taunt in OOC, you need to be proved wrong.” Would also like to point out that this is the biggest paradoxical paragraph I’ve ever seen as you was the one taunting about us being banned and mocking the contra situation.
[18:22]
I sUgGeSt that you drop the cocky attitude as it really rubs of on people different ways, and I mean its just not needed. Well, I guess now I know not to build in the bluefin area like we did as it’s “directly against rule 9.8 of basing '9.8 Bases utilising the public area of Bluefin Suites are not permitted and bases within the building must be contained to their respective property”.
I would like to point out to you that what you have stated here: “Show some humility as if you were actually sorry instead of throwing your toys out the pram” and “if you weren't so a prick” is against the forum rules as stated in rule 1f, I assume you know this but I would like to remind you nevertheless. This language isn’t acceptable.
-Joshy
2) “You were being raided for contraband, which you DID have.” Yes this is true that we had contra, you decided to raid almost instantaneously after the confrontation however, “you refused to remove the base and started the insults” is partially incorrect, as I said I’m certain that I never directly said nor implied that I won’t be removing the base under any circumstance as I wanted to check for myself if the rule you stated was correct but before I got the opportunity you walked back up the stairs and started to raid, the insults I said however were a result of the cocky attitude you gave off- which I believed might of rubbed me the wrong way a bit too much.
[18:22]
3) The claim “after you provoked us” again is incorrect after the ordeal at the apartments finished you or one of your associates were the first people to type in ooc about the situation calling us pussies and losers (which you said you did) – “so if we call you pussies and losers (not virgins) in OOC”. The response I gave was sarcastic as you literally gained nothing from the raid as the printers were destroyed, which is factual. “YOU started being hostile when we were simply warning you about the rules” I might have come across hostile in this situation however again this was due to the cocky attitude YOU gave when being face to face with me through a transparent part of the gate. You then later stated “I suggested destroying your contraband was questionable, not against the rules” Yes this is true it is our contra and destroying it is allowed however, the way it was worded in ooc by either you or someone else came across like it was against the rules.
4) “it has an overly unfair advantage to the defenders (e.g. one way props, tight corriders with firing holes, no cover for keypads etc)”. Firstly, there was no unfair advantage to the base which you only saw when you raided the top floor might I add- as you are clearly able to shoot our heads and torso from either side of shooting section which then invalidates the claim “Having unfair shooting angles (with only the head visible) is unfair.” Secondly, we didn’t even retaliate when you raided so the claim again in invalid as the so-called “unfair shooting angles” weren’t utilised.
[18:22]
5) “give their usernames instead of getting in the way and hiding their names” I’m not getting in the way I’m simply referring to the mandem how you did. “Their bodies were found in the bedroom area of your bluefin suite. They suicded (or killed eachother) without use of the balcony. If this was someone else's body you should probably say who and why now.” These bodies you found were from previous Corleone members which decided to raid us when we were under the “rebel” job role. “Jumping off a 5 story building was obviously suicide” elaborate please which rule was broken in the suicide incident, as my friends tried to edge off the balcony, hoping to catch themselves on a lower floor, this failed and they unfortunately died, this was not intentional.
6) “ If you are going to start the old 'he's broken the rules so I shouldn't be banned for the rules I broke' nonsense, make a PR” that was not my intent with that claim I was trying to point out how potentially YOU but definitely someone from your clan seem to protrude around the map thinking you can RDM and hostage without consequences- which is being shown in another PR.
[18:22]
7) “The raid was 7 minutes long” I don’t recall the exact duration of the event entirely however it was definitely more than 7 mins long. “Chechen is struggling to sort out the video so it will probably be done later” I’m not sure how this is possible as retrieving a short video of 7mins usually doesn’t take this long as its unedited footage of the entire event and what followed right? “Your crying in OOC lasted 20 minutes after that” I mean if you are calling us receiving consistent abuse and mockery after the raid finished crying then I suggest you pick up a dictionary for £6.55 in WHSmith.
“There are lots showing how your friends died (and who they were)” then I’m not sure why you are asking for the names if the intel you have already displays this information, making the question earlier redundant. “There are logs showing your messages in OOC.” Yeah there should be, it should also show the things you were bellowing out for no apparent reason, hopefully this will make you realise that you aren’t a goody too shoes and are all innocent which you seem to be implying. “'b-b-but he was nasty toooo” btw no one said this lol.
“honest truth is that if you weren't so a prick during and after the whole situation I wouldn't have even given you a second thought, let alone made a PR on you. But when someone as proud of arrogant as you decides to throw around their own insecurities as insults to distract from their rule-breaking and then brag about it and taunt in OOC, you need to be proved wrong.” Would also like to point out that this is the biggest paradoxical paragraph I’ve ever seen as you was the one taunting about us being banned and mocking the contra situation.
[18:22]
I sUgGeSt that you drop the cocky attitude as it really rubs of on people different ways, and I mean its just not needed. Well, I guess now I know not to build in the bluefin area like we did as it’s “directly against rule 9.8 of basing '9.8 Bases utilising the public area of Bluefin Suites are not permitted and bases within the building must be contained to their respective property”.
I would like to point out to you that what you have stated here: “Show some humility as if you were actually sorry instead of throwing your toys out the pram” and “if you weren't so a prick” is against the forum rules as stated in rule 1f, I assume you know this but I would like to remind you nevertheless. This language isn’t acceptable.
-Joshy