Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
03-11-2012, 11:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:01 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Alright, in my opinion, and others that I know, I do not think that admins arguing against a person who calls abuse in a thread should be able to close that same thread right away. I find it annoying that an admin can just say "oh no abuse, so too bad". I think only Super admins, Soul, and Nudelholz should be able to close any abuse threads. It is obvious in a thread that does not need to be named that an admin argued against the abuse, and decided that they did not want to have to deal with it anymore, and locked it.
This was the lock reason:
"Thread was locked for duration of review to avoid evidence tampering."
..hmm? evidence tampering? what does that even mean? There was a screenshot slapped on the first page. This should not continue happening. More input should be in the thread, and should not be closed in around 4-5 hours. Especially if there is evidence of the rule broken, admins should not be able to close a thread whenever they want.
I am not trying to make a flame thread. I am just making my opinion here. I think super admins and the two leaders would be able to handle the situation more appropriately.
This was the lock reason:
"Thread was locked for duration of review to avoid evidence tampering."
..hmm? evidence tampering? what does that even mean? There was a screenshot slapped on the first page. This should not continue happening. More input should be in the thread, and should not be closed in around 4-5 hours. Especially if there is evidence of the rule broken, admins should not be able to close a thread whenever they want.
I am not trying to make a flame thread. I am just making my opinion here. I think super admins and the two leaders would be able to handle the situation more appropriately.