05-05-2019, 02:22 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(05-05-2019, 01:21 PM)Dimitris Wrote:(05-05-2019, 06:35 AM)Pollux Wrote:Not really, I'm not sure how long we had V2D for, but we had a full server almost every day until we switched again.(05-05-2019, 05:22 AM)Dimitris Wrote:(05-04-2019, 10:35 PM)Jonas Wrote: V2D sucks; Yea it created loads of passiveRP’ers and agressiveRPers alike, but that’s the past now. It will never be the same and we’re moving towards new times as we should be. I’d never want to go back to it, the only good thing about it is memories and performance really.How can you say that when every time we've switched to V2D we'had a full server?
When V2D was revived (multiple times btw) a lot of players just avoided playing, would rather not have that happen again. V2D has had it’s time, let it die.
We also had a full server during pines before we switched and V4B1 after we switched. It was just all new map hype every time we switched, nothing else.
Before we switched to V2D we had pines. which we also had a full server for until it kept crashing people. After we isolated the issues to the map, we switched to V2D until we could get a second vote done. We definitely weren't on V2D long either, I can't remember an exact time frame though. After we switched to V4B1, we again had a full server. I think it's unfair to say the server pop was due to V2D, as it was just as populated during Pines and V4B1.
Pollux
Fearless Management
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________