My Opinion

[Azusa Nakano]

I personally think admin applications should be opened for say... 5 days, and the admin team AND the rest of the players can give their opinions on who should and shouldn't be given trial admin.
That should eliminate a goods amount of the complaints about the admin team, as everyone will have had an opportunity to have a say.

No, just no.

What damage would it cause?

I'll give you two examples.

First; If a couple of unemployed citizens were to write a job application, who were to decide whether they would get the job or not? The unemployed citizens, or the CEO in the company? (Example between players and administrators)

Second; If an administrator is very strict, most players will most likely vote no because they get banned a lot. It's unfair to choose which players can vote and who can't, therefore it's better for votes to be administrator votes.

The whole point of letting the players vote is because they are the ones complaining. If there were so many complaints about the people who got those jobs, They wouldn't have them for long. Everyone is complaining about how there's not enough admins on and when someone new gets trial admin they complain about who.
It simply seemed like a logical way to eliminate the majority of said complaints about the admin team.