Punishments

[Deleted User]

As someone who’s been on both sides of the line I can confirm it’s dealt with on a case by case basis.

Back when I was Staff I used to take certain things into consideration such as experience on the server, previous record, so on so forth. The only thing there should be a standard length for is TOS in my opinion. Other than that it should all be dealt with on a case by case basis.

I somewhat disagree with using hours on the server as a base for punishment length, sure someone with 1000 hours should know not to teamkill, but with x amount of hours, you'll eventually slip up, and according to what you're saying, that should be game over

Reebs never mentioned hours though?

Experience and hours are two very different things, and I'd personally say that hours is more of a subcategory for experience. I've dealt with cases where people who typically PassiveRP slip up when they try agressiveRP, to which I usually give them a warning.

Yeah, you shouldnt dictate a ban length on hours. Older players who have racked over 1000 back in 2013 join and they join back a little rusty with the rules, yes they should read the rules before connecting to the server after such a long time, but issuing a long ban because 'they should know better'. I feel bans should be a last resort kind of thing, talk to the player and see what the crack is before placing the judgement.

Plus I'm a little slow in the head so forgive me if I mass RDM and CDM.