05-15-2018, 01:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(05-15-2018, 01:22 PM)Shlomo Wrote:(05-15-2018, 01:19 PM)Falc Wrote:(05-15-2018, 06:12 AM)Marty Wrote: cough FALC, Jackz cough
Bruh.
If I deem a staff members actions or decisions invalid then I’ll argue it still just as I would before.
Only thing I’ve learnt is how to come across more approachable rather than “Fuck you, you’re wrong wtf abuse”.
As an old, experienced player, I’d rather set example nowadays, whereas before I couldn’t have cared less.
Guess maturity kicked in for myself, lmao.
I preferred the old one, more interesting and a better person in general. Setting examples is pointless if all control over what examples you can set are managed by someone else.
I probably preferred the old one before hand too. But I grew up to an extent where I could argue in a more fashionable mature manner.
Setting examples is never pointless when the examples set can also go to the ones who manage. I’ve worn the shoes and have experience over a lot of the commmunity and a fair few staff, so it can be used by mostly all.
Although not sure changing made me a worse person, just more respectable if anything.