UBR: field
#17
(08-30-2016, 02:19 PM)Jonas Wrote: yea, its an insult. but as brikaas said it wasn't a major one, and he was there so he could explain the situation.

And i am requesting someone else to conclude this as Agorith will be biased.


You've just admitted to breaking rule 5.6 once again.

If another staff member would want to have a say, they're free to.
But you can't request for another staff member to handle my case, this is involving me after all.
You're about the millionth person to call me biased towards said rulebreakers when in reality not a single one has crossed my mind before, not until I have to deal with the cases.
This case will be mainly handled by myself.


Messages In This Thread
UBR: field - by Jonas - 08-30-2016, 01:45 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Ratatoskrr - 08-30-2016, 01:47 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Jonas - 08-30-2016, 02:00 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Ratatoskrr - 08-30-2016, 02:02 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Agorith - 08-30-2016, 02:04 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Jonas - 08-30-2016, 02:19 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Agorith - 08-30-2016, 07:06 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Ratatoskrr - 08-30-2016, 02:20 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Jonas - 08-30-2016, 02:24 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Jonas - 08-30-2016, 03:33 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Ratatoskrr - 08-30-2016, 03:57 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Agorith - 08-30-2016, 06:56 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Ratatoskrr - 08-30-2016, 04:21 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Jonas - 08-30-2016, 04:28 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Ratatoskrr - 08-30-2016, 04:28 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Jonas - 08-30-2016, 04:41 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Ratatoskrr - 08-30-2016, 06:06 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Jonas - 08-30-2016, 07:50 PM
RE: UBR: field - by Agorith - 08-30-2016, 08:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)