Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts
Avgar Offline
Baltic
******
Veteran - Management+
Posts: 1,643
Threads: 162
Likes Received: 1,838 in 474 posts
Likes Given: 647
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 92
Country: Lithuania
#23
08-01-2016, 12:27 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:05 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
(08-01-2016, 12:16 PM)Adam James Wrote:
(08-01-2016, 12:07 PM)Avgar Wrote: Everyone has an opinion. If we allow just about anyone voice their opinions in courthouse cases (which would happen all the damn time in the courthouse these days) then the threads would be a mess (and they were).

Bullshit.
Pure bullshit and you know it.

You haven't seen any of the more popular cases that had an abundance of uninvolved posters, most of them saying 'I'll take my warning, but X Y Z'?

Also, is it really necessary to flip and proclaim everything is 'bullshit', 'a joke' or that people are 'braindead', etc.? Is it that difficult to have a civil discussion?
[Image: xBktCem.png]
The following 3 users Like Avgar's post:
  • Agorith, MacTavish, Jonas
Find


Messages In This Thread
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by Avgar - 08-01-2016, 12:27 PM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by User 19014 - 08-01-2016, 02:15 PM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by User 19014 - 08-01-2016, 02:43 PM
RE: Changes to punishments for uninvolved posts - by Create - 08-04-2016, 04:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
Contact Us | Fearless Forums | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication