GHOSTK1LL3R

[Infernaw]

-snip-

So then how can you expect someone to defend themselves on something they don't know of?

It also makes me laugh that all you reply to is the evidence bit, did you forget to read the other paragraphs on behalf of Ghost's defence? Or is it just as long as you mention the evidence that keeps him banned?

It seems as your reply states, Infernaw. All you care about is the evidence part not being public or even shown to Ghost, and that's very sketchy and almost seems like a cover up. It literally is the only bit you've replied to and you've missed the rest of the arguments given. Especially the bit about your "Perfect" staff members.

It's quite annoying when staff decide to completely block out certain points you make and ignore it, just to get to the bit where you can keep someone banned.

I understand that keeping on painting up the staff team as the "bad guys" is good for your own gain, but I pointed out something that I had a saying in.
Since I'm not the banning administrator, I rather wait for Avgar's reply regarding the actual ban.