Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs
#20
(07-01-2016, 08:59 PM)Falc Wrote: Moderator is a trial position, therefor they shouldn't be doing an Administrators role.

If this is the case, then how is it that a Moderator can ban somebody for something such as scamming? Would that not be considered the role of an administrator? You may say that it is their duty to punish them for breaking the rule, but why have the middle man? Why not just inform the administration team and have them deal with it from the start?

I personally think that the current system is fine how it is, because the way I see it, an administrator could always overrule the moderator as previously stated. Keeping in mind what you said about moderator being a "trial position," how will the moderators learn if they do not get the chance to be able to close these player reports? 

The way that the system is now is working a hell of a lot better than it used to because the few open cases in the Player Report section are being dealt with faster, therefore lightening the load on Administrators. With this current system in place, the administrators are having to worry much less about what's going on in the Player Report sub-forum and have to worry more about what's going on in the Unban Request and Unblacklist Request sub-forums in addition to their duties on the servers.
Regards,
Reebs
Veteran

[Image: zeVtdhR.png]


Messages In This Thread
Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - by Marty - 07-01-2016, 08:52 PM
RE: Why Are Moderators Still Handling PRs - by Reebs - 07-02-2016, 03:09 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)