[FL] Tomo, [FL] Shadow, [FL] Agorith

[User 12049]

Your point on the matter Reebs is that I didn't '...comply with admins decision.'. The reason for this matter is admins are expected to know and understand the rules and enforce those rules that are set in place for everyone to follow. However, the main admin in question, Tomo had lack of understanding of the rules and even commented on it when I was talking to him next to the BMW. Tomo stated that I was not allowed to take them hostage as their was no RP reason when in fact there was multiple reasons in regard to RP that allowed me to and equally the rules backed up my statement of which Tomo had no understand that the rule was even in the rule book.

Due to this admin's lack of understanding of the rules led to their situation occurring which is something that shouldn't of resulted in my punishment but of the punishment of the admin for not knowing the rules. Due to the admin not knowing this rules, it leads me to believe that this admin is ill-fit for duty as a staff member of the Fearless Community. If this admin is unable to know the rules himself, how can he be trusted to know other rules? Equally, when confronted by myself and told that the rules allow this rule and I explicitly put the rule into the @ chat so he could see it he then decided to ban us for not listening to his incorrect judgement.

Let's stick to this point in the upcoming posts. It seems to be going off topic.

My intentions and equally my reply was on-topic. The reply simply stated what had occurred in the situation backed up with claims by myself of what would are the re-percussions of keeping a staff member who is unable to comprehend the rules and what this could lead to in the future. Additionally, with my reply it gave insight into what specifically happened and equally addressed a key issue which could be claimed so I decided to go into detailed regarding what Reebs had claimed.