01-25-2016, 01:46 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(01-24-2016, 04:58 PM)Dazzle Novak Wrote: 1. Not seeing any "Blunt rulebreak" in this report? Is this what the court has to say? Did they managed to read the whole story? Or is it because he and his witness ("friend") have rp points and I don't? Think the situation would be different if it wasn't me standing there.
The players' stats have nothing to do with the judgement on a report.
What made me say that there is not any blunt rulebreak is because:
RDM: He was given a reason to kill you, after he was tazed. I'm not saying it was roleplayed flawlessly by him, but it is not completely RDM either.
FearRP: He was not under gunpoint like I thought he was before. He ran around a corner and came back shortly to have his revenge on you.
2.They had enough time to make printscreens /demo of this situation, why didn't they do that in the first place?
That I do not know. If he killed you because he thought you were breaking the rules, that leads us to Backseat Administration.
3.Even rp criminals have to watch their language and follow the rp rules.
And I doubt an officer likes to being shot by an criminal.
Never heard of an criminal who got not hunted down for killing an policeman, in real life.
Like I said, it was not RP'ed flawlessly, but it was not completely RDM either.
Thank you.
![[Image: yk9I3Jg.png]](https://i.imgur.com/yk9I3Jg.png)