Poll: If a player takes reasonable and justified action to prevent calamity on the server, should they be punished?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
44.12%
15 44.12%
No
55.88%
19 55.88%
Total 34 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Rule 1.9 [backseat administration]
#13
All this "wait for admin, or record and post br" stuff is nonsence
People who break such rules (propkill, propspam) 99% of time know that it's prohibited (unless they are imbeciles) and do it solely to troll and annoy people. They don't give a f uck if they get banned straight away or after few hours. They might not even join the server after they finished their fun, but your experience is ruined already because you can't do shit.

It's even worse when admins are online but busy messing around with friends dealing with other cases.

People must have some sort of freedom in such things, as someone mentioned, there is a difference between killing minge every time he spawns, and quietly cuff/detain/lock him to prevent further abuse. 

Saying that it would be rulebreak, yes it is. But only because it's in the rules, if it wasn't there, it would not be one.

People used to get banned for racism IC, then rule was removed, and it stopped being a rule breakage. Same can be with anything else. (I know that rule was re added, but it was just an example)


Messages In This Thread
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Balls - 12-09-2015, 12:20 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Falc - 12-09-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Spear - 12-09-2015, 01:13 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Spear - 12-09-2015, 01:19 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Prosto - 12-09-2015, 02:28 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Emil - 12-09-2015, 02:44 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Tomo - 12-09-2015, 04:18 PM
RE: Rule 1.9 [backseat administration] - by Reebs - 12-16-2015, 12:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)