Poll: Should players be allowed to disallow certain admins to review their case to limit bias?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
48.15%
 13 48.15%
No
51.85%
 14 51.85%
Total 27 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Should people be allowed to disallow certain admins to review their (un)ban requests?
RIC0H Offline
Senior Member
***
Posts: 687
Threads: 64
Likes Received: 233 in 155 posts
Likes Given: 56
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation: 2
Country: United Kingdom
#27
09-26-2015, 11:59 AM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
(09-26-2015, 11:09 AM)Kierondeeuk Wrote: No, they shouldn't. If an admin banned you, (s)he would know the most about your specific case, thus (s)he should be allowed to deny your UBR if you broke the rules.

It's the same with admin abuse threads, right. The admin being reported would be the one that knows the most regarding the case, so they should be allowed to review their own case and approve/deny it.

We also can guarantee that they would not be bias towards themselves (as it has already been stated that staff are completely unbiased (as if they are machines))

[sarc]

(09-25-2015, 06:31 PM)Audacter Wrote: If we can't trust staff to not be bias, what is the point in trusting them in looking after the server?

Why can't admins review their own admin abuse threads?
And then tell me again why they should be able to review UBRs that they issued or reports that they are involved in.
[Image: get.php?s=STEAM_0:1:68652272&b=16]
Find


Messages In This Thread
RE: Should people be allowed to disallow certain admins to review their (un)ban requests? - by RIC0H - 09-26-2015, 11:59 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Contact Us | Fearless Forums | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication