(05-17-2015, 11:57 PM)Venom Wrote: *cough* super admins *cough*My understanding was just that SA's where just an overruling body (With the exception of Temar, what I know of atleast), not a decision making body. My argument is a firm decision making body, could improve the community.
(05-18-2015, 01:21 AM)Nacreas Wrote: The reason we don't have one "head administrator" is to avoid situations where we have a power-hungry madman running the team.Nacreas, I think you have misunderstood my intention. I believe you should have more trust and faith in your team, as I have to decide the best Head of the community. Remember the vote that I was talking about, is ONLY available for the staff and I trust you to know eachother well enough to make a good choice. And just a shoutout to Rolórox as well, I trust the entire staff has it undercontrol I just think that Soulripper's lack of interest in the community is a problem and this idea was a solution to it.
Honestly the team is fine and you guys should have more faith in us as we're constantly discussing ways to improve the gamemode and community.
(05-18-2015, 01:30 AM)LivKX Wrote: Lmfao this isn't some darkrp server, we don't need no head admins and 14 co-owners. Works fine as it is. Raptor stated his issue is with soul. A structure change won't change Souls personality.I'm not sure about the DarkRP reference? As stated we already have SA's and they are doing a good job, ohh well atleast Temar because that's the only one I have seen using his status as SA (to organised the development team). About the Soul's personality, I don't think there is a reason to change his personality due to what I could understand on the issue were just that Soul was just no longer interested, which this idea then counter.
Pointless.
Lastly: Thank you all for the response and the good tone. I really like that all you staff members took the time to make a comment and give me an insight in how it all functions. Hope we can keep this debate going
