03-07-2015, 12:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:03 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
I'll put my two cents in, as i've not really commented on the matter as of yet.
Whether whom fired first is a little irrelevant in this case, as if you were to fire, you would clearly hit, and possibly kill the hostage. That's a fact. So actually shooting at 'us', rather than perhaps retreating may have been an error. But on the other hand, I would've probably done the same as what you did. It's commonly stated that hostageRP is broken if the hostage-takers shoot, and so it'd be your call to make. Did you break a rule? I'd say it's more of a grey area, but on paper, then no. Obviously the admin would make a final verdict, but I honestly think taking this to a BR is probably a bit over the top.
TL;DR I personally think this ban request is a bit stupid, as they acted in self defence to shoot, as would many other people. In doing so, they risked the life of the hostage, however they have a right to make that judgement, as far as I am aware.
Whether whom fired first is a little irrelevant in this case, as if you were to fire, you would clearly hit, and possibly kill the hostage. That's a fact. So actually shooting at 'us', rather than perhaps retreating may have been an error. But on the other hand, I would've probably done the same as what you did. It's commonly stated that hostageRP is broken if the hostage-takers shoot, and so it'd be your call to make. Did you break a rule? I'd say it's more of a grey area, but on paper, then no. Obviously the admin would make a final verdict, but I honestly think taking this to a BR is probably a bit over the top.
TL;DR I personally think this ban request is a bit stupid, as they acted in self defence to shoot, as would many other people. In doing so, they risked the life of the hostage, however they have a right to make that judgement, as far as I am aware.
A more fitting signature.Â