Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
01-22-2015, 06:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:03 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
"Raptor, what you're failing to understand here is that I could only purely go off of the evidence, I was involved because my name was on the bloody BR and I was sticking up for Cujo as neither I or him deserved to get banned with the evidence that Radde has provided. I never stated that he didn't prop spam, I stated that the evidence was insufficient and couldn't warrant a ban for prop spamming as you have to have pure evidence, which he didn't have. Answer one thing for me, watch the 3 videos that Radde uploaded and tell me, would you have accepted that BR having only them 3 videos as evidence? I can almost GUARENTEEE that you wouldn't have, and that was what I was basing my defence for Cujo off of, a lack of evidence on Gray Face's behalf. Cujo said "First of all, that could be anyone, second of all, I was testing out my stacker because earlier it wasn't working, so I checked and moved the sliders around and voila, it was working. Swiftly after, I deleted the stacked props"
"Them images literally show nothing they could have been anybodies props Cujo admitted to stacking them once but I don't see that as a violation he did it once and it was only to check his stacker tool."
"Unless you've got some solid proof in that video you've literally got nothing on I or cujo as the images are redundant.".
All I was doing was fortifying what Cujo said.
I never once made a bald statement saying "Cujo never prop spammed." All I said was that the images didn't provide sufficient evidence and that if he didn't have any solid proof he had nothing on either I or Cujo. I was simply stating facts, not at all did I lie in the courthouse in this case or any case for that matter."
"Them images literally show nothing they could have been anybodies props Cujo admitted to stacking them once but I don't see that as a violation he did it once and it was only to check his stacker tool."
"Unless you've got some solid proof in that video you've literally got nothing on I or cujo as the images are redundant.".
All I was doing was fortifying what Cujo said.
I never once made a bald statement saying "Cujo never prop spammed." All I said was that the images didn't provide sufficient evidence and that if he didn't have any solid proof he had nothing on either I or Cujo. I was simply stating facts, not at all did I lie in the courthouse in this case or any case for that matter."