GHOSTK1LL3R UBR
#8
(01-17-2015, 10:23 PM)Nevy Wrote: Having a weapon pointed at the ground can still classify under FearRP.

You say 'can' how 'can' it. It's either yes or no. Stop trying to find holes in my story

I suggest you read the following thread which was made by a staff member that has now resigned.

http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=42172

FearRP is simply the concept that you should value your life and would not do anything to jeopardize it. Having his weapon pointed at the ground would technically give him the upper hand in a situation as he would be able to quickly point it at you before you could pull a gun out. 

I have Kevlar(And kevlar would EASILY stop that bullet that a cop would be held with so if you really want to go onto the FearRP concept I win FearRP a lot more than the cop

But do not change the subject, this ban was issued on the basis surrounding the killing of the officers because of an invalid reason and the number of people that you had to kill as a result of that incident.

The killing of the police was situational. I was forced to shoot. I followed their orders until they took it too far. 

And another thing to note is that they in no way indicated that you were going to be arrested. Therefore using that as an excuse will not work and neither will indicating that running through a checkpoint is less Aggressive than killing the officers who are running the checkpoint. AggressiveRP is permitted but killing those officers with an invalid reason is not.
I am sorry, but did you watch the video? Are you on purpose turning a blind eye to them saying 'Don't let him through'. What did you deduct from this? What do you think they'll do when they BOTH are at my car and after not letting me go through the checkpoint.

'but killing those officers with an invalid reason is not.'...What? How do you deduct this? It was extremely valid, are you yet again merely avoiding what I say everytime? You seem to ignore what I say in my other posts to make me sound wrong. As you seem to be turning a blind eye to my points I will repost them here so you can read them.

' Let me add something a few days ago a player called 'Edned' got banned for:'attempting to bate police'(http://www.fearlessrp.net/showthread.php?tid=56640).I bring this up because surely me RAMMING through the checkpoint would be bating police to chase me? And wouldn't it also be braking the unwritten rule that you must try and PassiveRP it out before ramming the checkpoint down? I stopped at the checkpoint because I wanted to get through WITHOUT getting into agressiveRP. When I tried the passiveRP way of getting through did not work I resulted to killing them to get through.'

My statement that you had no intention to RP was based on the fact that you chose to kill all officers without even saying anything. Shooting me inside my vehicle while I was driving through the tunnel and killing all government officials that were running away from you. You killed both officers while they were using chat to talk and were completely vulnerable.

Without saying anything? It was quite obvious that they wasn't going to let me go. If they was going to abide FearRP because I had a galil pointed to their head and I was clearly trained and well armed with all of my clothing on I could of pursued RP but as you can clearly see this was not the case. You seem to turn yet again a blind eye to this and only focusing on anything that favours your argument and not considering the other side for the cops.  Thats metagaming is it not? I am pretty sure they don't type in real life so me 'assuming' that they're typing would be metagaming. Equally, in real life if they was to be sending a radio message, it wouldn't say on the top of their head' typing' so I took them out when I though they was looking the wrong way. 


Question my knowledge of the rules all you want, but I believe you are the one that needs to take some time to better understand what FailRP is and how your actions were in violation of our rules due to the fact that your reason was unacceptable.

So far all you do is throw the same excuses for my ban which are in no way valid to the situation. You merely forget the fact that I decided to RP this out and are looking for a way to ban me which is pathetic. 

I am requesting a neutral admin that is neither friend of Nevy nor friend of myself(which is literally any admin as I am friends to conclude this) because I can see bias occurring in this UBR.


Messages In This Thread
GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by User 12049 - 01-17-2015, 10:58 AM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by Decay - 01-17-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by User 12049 - 01-17-2015, 01:39 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by Nevy - 01-17-2015, 07:55 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by User 12049 - 01-17-2015, 09:41 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by User 12049 - 01-17-2015, 10:16 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by Nevy - 01-17-2015, 10:23 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by User 12049 - 01-17-2015, 10:47 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by Nevy - 01-17-2015, 11:17 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by User 12049 - 01-18-2015, 08:43 AM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by Emil - 01-31-2015, 01:11 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by User 12049 - 01-31-2015, 01:19 PM
RE: GHOSTK1LL3R UBR - by General Rickets - 02-03-2015, 10:01 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)