Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
12-28-2014, 01:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:03 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
"So, you can fit atleast 3 people in the space of the fading door inside"
So if 3 people fit in something it's not a doombase?
There were also even more blockades like screenshot 2 and 3 in the house, but I didn't manage to get a screenshot of those, because no one could even pass the fading door trap.
This raises the question: what is a doombase?
according to the official fearless RP rules a good base must stick to the following rules:
8. Props where only 1 side is textured are only allowed to be used as a window. Using these props for an advantage in shooting is not allowed.
9. Doom forts are not allowed. This means you cannot make it hard for the opposing force to raid you. (ex: mazes, having to crouch or jump over props, small firing holes.)
Fitting 3 people in a base however, does not remove any of these rules.
Now we take a look at this doombase: you specifically tell us that you broke rule 8 by saying: "I mean that you could see through only from the other side." Which is proven by screenshot 2 and 3. You also break rule 9. In screenshot 1 we can see you built a base which requires any raiding party to jump over props in order to enter the base. Inside the house this was exacvtly the same. Yet I have no proof of it existing, you however have no proof of it not existing either.
This brings us to the conclusion. Simply put: You broke 2 rules from the "fearless base rules" section. You give me proof of 3 people fitting inside the base. Thanks for showing us this, but it changes absoutely nothing about the rulebreak. Then some random dude, which I guess is your friend shows up and tells us agrees with you. This is of absolutely zero value to this ban request. He breaks another rule here:
1. You are only allowed to write in one of these topics, if you are:
the accused player
the accusing player
a witness or in any other IMPORTANT relation to the Ban Request.
He is none of the above. (screenshot in case he decides to be smart and remove his comment: http://imgur.com/jUs8DwI)
good luck to you, boy.
So if 3 people fit in something it's not a doombase?
There were also even more blockades like screenshot 2 and 3 in the house, but I didn't manage to get a screenshot of those, because no one could even pass the fading door trap.
This raises the question: what is a doombase?
according to the official fearless RP rules a good base must stick to the following rules:
8. Props where only 1 side is textured are only allowed to be used as a window. Using these props for an advantage in shooting is not allowed.
9. Doom forts are not allowed. This means you cannot make it hard for the opposing force to raid you. (ex: mazes, having to crouch or jump over props, small firing holes.)
Fitting 3 people in a base however, does not remove any of these rules.
Now we take a look at this doombase: you specifically tell us that you broke rule 8 by saying: "I mean that you could see through only from the other side." Which is proven by screenshot 2 and 3. You also break rule 9. In screenshot 1 we can see you built a base which requires any raiding party to jump over props in order to enter the base. Inside the house this was exacvtly the same. Yet I have no proof of it existing, you however have no proof of it not existing either.
This brings us to the conclusion. Simply put: You broke 2 rules from the "fearless base rules" section. You give me proof of 3 people fitting inside the base. Thanks for showing us this, but it changes absoutely nothing about the rulebreak. Then some random dude, which I guess is your friend shows up and tells us agrees with you. This is of absolutely zero value to this ban request. He breaks another rule here:
1. You are only allowed to write in one of these topics, if you are:
the accused player
the accusing player
a witness or in any other IMPORTANT relation to the Ban Request.
He is none of the above. (screenshot in case he decides to be smart and remove his comment: http://imgur.com/jUs8DwI)
good luck to you, boy.