Poll: Remove 3rd person when shooting?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Do not remove
65.00%
52 65.00%
Yes, remove
35.00%
28 35.00%
Total 80 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use
#36
(12-04-2014, 12:16 PM)Smex Wrote:
(12-04-2014, 10:13 AM)Baskingner Wrote: *snip*

No matter how strict the doom fort rules are, the defender still has the advantage with a foot thick metal plate covering 3/4 of the body, that is advantage and does not need to be furthered by the defender able to see your every move without them seeing you.

Third person abuse does not have a place in the FL community, no matter how strict doom fort rules are. It is meta-gaming, unrealistic and exploiting.

The attacker is still very much able to use cover themselves. Like is said in an earlier post: "This forces the attacker to use smarter tactics like flanking and covering fire instead of mindless charges (which is far more realistic in my opinion)".

It's only your opinion that it has no place in the FL community, and a large majority doesnt support that opinion. In real life i can peek around a corner without killing myself so i dont see this as metagaming or exploiting.


Messages In This Thread
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by Baskingner - 12-04-2014, 12:22 PM
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by User 12049 - 12-04-2014, 04:57 PM
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by User 12049 - 12-04-2014, 05:16 PM
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by User 12049 - 12-04-2014, 06:54 PM
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by User 12049 - 12-05-2014, 06:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)