Poll: Remove 3rd person when shooting?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Do not remove
65.00%
52 65.00%
Yes, remove
35.00%
28 35.00%
Total 80 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use
#34
(12-04-2014, 10:13 AM)Baskingner Wrote: This has nothing to do with being a "1st person shooter", FL discourages aggresiveRP but it still has a strong element in it, There are even clans built around the idea. Like Jan said 3rd person adds something to FL, something other servers dont and removing it would be a painful feature strip for most people.

I agree on you that the "peeking" gives the defender a certain advantage, but imagine if we remove this feature. As an attacker i would just slowly advance with my gun aimed at the corner where the defender is hiding, the second he tries to "peek" ill tear him to shreds since half is body is exposed. There is no way of seeing the attacker except 3rd person or exposing a large part of your body in 1st person, Hence why i like 3rd person in combat as well. I rather give the defender an advantage then giving the attacker one.

**Attackers have almost no disadvantage with the very strict doomfort rules on the server, i am sure that they can handle this small disadvantage.**

Good point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
[Image: e5bf68204644a67fc15ab6cd327926a2.png]
The following 1 user Likes Obay's post:
  • Sleepy Knight 生活


Messages In This Thread
Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by Obay - 12-04-2014, 12:10 PM
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by User 12049 - 12-04-2014, 04:57 PM
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by User 12049 - 12-04-2014, 05:16 PM
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by User 12049 - 12-04-2014, 06:54 PM
RE: Poll: 3rd person enable or disable at weapon use - by User 12049 - 12-05-2014, 06:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)