06-14-2014, 03:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:03 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(06-14-2014, 03:36 PM)Aviator Wrote: -snip-
I am failing to see how I was 'Off-Topic' and 'Inciting Flame' when I made my opinions, which (due to the actually quite civil nature of the thread) no-one took the wrong way [I thank member's for that, because usually at Fearless - it does turn quite nasty... but it didn't this time]. I said goodbye. I replied to members.
The thread was closed due to a flamewar occurring. Part of which I believe you and fultz had an influence on.
Where was the teamwork? You have to remember, this is an admin case, since the thread was indeed closed.
Enzyme Wrote:Please say your goodbyes and leave it at that.
Aviator Wrote:You may post your opinions and state goodbye...
Big difference.
Why was the thread closed? If what you were doing wasn't participating in a flamewar, then, in my opinion the thread should not have been closed in the first place. Other users stated their opinion on what they have observed, related to previous replies from other users. I see no difference between their replies and yours.
EDIT:
Aviator Wrote:...[I thank member's for that, because usually at Fearless - it does turn quite nasty... but it didn't this time]...Actually, according to Enzyme, the thread had to close because apparently a "flamewar" had occurred and had gotten out of hand.
EDIT 2:
Also, as far as "...gossip and lies are spread without any facts to back up anything." Perhaps this may interest some.
Aviator Wrote:"Please provide substantial evidence that there was a demotion. As a matter of fact, Eisenhorn resigned."
Fearless IRC Wrote:[18:47] <+Enzyme> This is obviously for the HR to decide, but should Eisenhorn be demoted for what he has done? Opinions?
[18:47] <+Enzyme> If so; Veteran tag?
[18:47] <Fultz> The last on is Inactivity but that is now voided due to him supplying a reason
[18:47] <Fultz> No Tag
[18:47] <Faustie> Eisenhorn's actions aren't entirely his own I don't think
[18:47] <Fultz> Mods dont get tags
[18:47] <Faustie> From what I remember, KJ/Narc wanted someone to be their attack dog
[18:47] <+Floodify> Veteran Tag, no
[18:47] <Faustie> a la Ruxandra style
[18:47] <+Floodify> Demote , Yes
[18:47] <Fultz> Yes that was his job
[18:47] <+Shadewie> I think that he should be demoted for his actions and no veteran.
Fearless IRC Wrote:[18:54] <Fultz> Alright so who believes Eisenhonr should be demoted? Yes to demotion or no to demotion
[18:54] <+Enzyme> YEs
[18:54] <+Kpred> Yes
[18:54] <+Shadewie> Yes
[18:54] <Fultz> Yes
[18:54] <+Floodify> Yes!
[18:54] <+LukeAviator> Yes.
[18:54] <@Flame223> Yes
01[18:54] <Termin> On the fence
Fearless IRC Wrote:03[19:01] * Faustie changes topic to 'Fearless Administrator Commitee -- CURRENT TOPIC: WHAT TO TELL PUBLIC REGARDING NEW STAFF STRUCTURE'
[19:01] <+LukeAviator> Ah
[19:01] <Faustie> Now we have a new structure, and we've agreed that for now, its all internal
[19:01] <+LukeAviator> I've been thinking of this last night in bed.
[19:01] <Faustie> But we still have people wondering about why there are no SAs
[19:02] <Faustie> So I think we should at least public a message, either saying the situation is resolved, or we've just slightly changed structure for what we believe to be the better
01[19:02] <Termin> Agreed
[19:02] <+Floodify> Agreed
[19:02] <+Enzyme> Inform them that we've made changes, and that we're back and running
Hmm...
Fearless IRC Wrote:[19:10] <+Shadewie> So are we going to grant Fultz and doomdude a rank on the page?
[19:10] <+Shadewie> Or will it stay as it is?
01[19:10] <Termin> Its still internal for now
I do expect an apology.
I am starting to think that the thread was closed to hide the truth.
If admins are going to continue to be bias, I am afraid these may be my last words here, hey, even this thread will probably be closed.