BR on two
Freezak Offline
One of the Elders
***
Posts: 3,234
Threads: 128
Likes Received: 1,066 in 538 posts
Likes Given: 342
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 70
#20
01-28-2014, 11:19 AM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:03 AM by Fearless Community. Edit Reason: Checked Encoding )
That was an example of breaking the rules in need of evidence: that is breaking NLR because you need some evidence against a person breaking the rules - that could be a good reason, but yours wasn't.
[Image: images.jpg]
Find


Messages In This Thread
BR on two - by Syntex - 01-27-2014, 04:42 AM
RE: BR on two - by KiraMae19f - 01-27-2014, 05:51 AM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-27-2014, 05:57 AM
RE: BR on two - by Petercob - 01-27-2014, 06:25 AM
RE: BR on two - by Jared - 01-27-2014, 06:41 AM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-27-2014, 07:07 AM
RE: BR on two - by Petercob - 01-27-2014, 07:44 AM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-27-2014, 08:22 AM
RE: BR on two - by Petercob - 01-27-2014, 04:08 PM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-28-2014, 06:24 AM
RE: BR on two - by Petercob - 01-28-2014, 07:42 AM
RE: BR on two - by Freezak - 01-28-2014, 07:58 AM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-28-2014, 08:03 AM
RE: BR on two - by Freezak - 01-28-2014, 08:14 AM
RE: BR on two - by Jared - 01-28-2014, 08:09 AM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-28-2014, 08:14 AM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-28-2014, 08:19 AM
RE: BR on two - by Freezak - 01-28-2014, 09:06 AM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-28-2014, 09:45 AM
RE: BR on two - by Freezak - 01-28-2014, 11:19 AM
RE: BR on two - by Syntex - 01-28-2014, 11:45 AM
RE: BR on two - by Freezak - 01-28-2014, 11:50 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Contact Us | Fearless Forums | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication