Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
01-05-2014, 11:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:02 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Yes, that is correct, and I addressed this in an earlier post.
I know you cannot list every possible thing as a rule. The only reason I am stressing this now is because Narcotic showed that there are forum rules. The forum rules did not include what I did. I'm trying to point out that if you are to perm ban me for something that is not listed as a rule, why rush the ban? Why not a warning, I am still to be answered why I was not warned for something that is not a rule. If you want to believe it is a common knowledge sort of thing, wouldn't that be less offensive than a direct violation of a rule? In fact, I'd expect an admin more so to warn for a common sense issue since they are not violating a rule, not to be banned. "Stop doing these type of posts" or a similar statement was not said a single time. Narcotic said "This topic is not for trolling", and I was banned after that. I wonder why he told me that and I was banned after? Why not tell me that as a warning and see if I make another low-tier post?
And when I did this I wasn't looking for huge loopholes. Most of those posts were not flamebait or etc. The actual posts were not thought of to be hateful or even rude, mostly unnecessary. Just look back to those posts and consider if they deserve a permanent ban.
Lastly, going to mention this again because I don't want it to be ignored.
4. a)Our forum operates warning system, users will be warned till their warning level is increased to 100%. After those warnings a temporary ban will be put in place of between 1 to 7 days.
Don't see the reason the rule was ignored by the banning administrator
Quote:Additionally, if you'd like to use the argument that you can still enforce rules that are not listed, the warning system would have to be used. Otherwise, like I said, I cannot know every rule that is to be enforced, including what I did.
I know you cannot list every possible thing as a rule. The only reason I am stressing this now is because Narcotic showed that there are forum rules. The forum rules did not include what I did. I'm trying to point out that if you are to perm ban me for something that is not listed as a rule, why rush the ban? Why not a warning, I am still to be answered why I was not warned for something that is not a rule. If you want to believe it is a common knowledge sort of thing, wouldn't that be less offensive than a direct violation of a rule? In fact, I'd expect an admin more so to warn for a common sense issue since they are not violating a rule, not to be banned. "Stop doing these type of posts" or a similar statement was not said a single time. Narcotic said "This topic is not for trolling", and I was banned after that. I wonder why he told me that and I was banned after? Why not tell me that as a warning and see if I make another low-tier post?
And when I did this I wasn't looking for huge loopholes. Most of those posts were not flamebait or etc. The actual posts were not thought of to be hateful or even rude, mostly unnecessary. Just look back to those posts and consider if they deserve a permanent ban.
Lastly, going to mention this again because I don't want it to be ignored.
4. a)Our forum operates warning system, users will be warned till their warning level is increased to 100%. After those warnings a temporary ban will be put in place of between 1 to 7 days.
Don't see the reason the rule was ignored by the banning administrator