Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
11-21-2013, 08:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:02 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
-Snip-
Well, I misread your statement regarding that you didn't see the hostage (done homework now for a while, starting to see double, lol).
I still see your move of NOT taking down your gun after you had taken the shot to be wrong. They were saying to put it down, and police DO infact but their gun down when the situation is risky enough. IRL the hostage could have stabbed the Seargent and used him as protection. GMOD doesn't allow this, but I'm just thinking out of the box here.
The other SRU agent were already dealt with, as he started to walk down the stairs. I do not have footage of it, but he stepped in during my "hostage" situation, and they told him to back off and so he did. He didn't take a shot or so. He realised that you can't do this;
I'm look apart of your "shooting randomly" of course, since you did that on accident. It was pure reflection, I understand that now as you claimed you didn't see me. But yet, you could have told him to take it down. Guns vs Knife, would mostly end up in you killing him. So you did have the advantage, but that's not what this is about.
It's up to an admin to decide whether this was valid or not, obviously. I simply see this as a rule breakage and not valid, but as I stated, I might be wrong.
[/quote]
If a person was surrounded, had a knife at a persons throat and was blocked from leaving the only option he has is surrendering, anything hostile towards the hostage would mean the hostage takers life would be over in seconds. I stand by my action of not putting my weapon down. It would've put more lives at risk and that's the main thing to avoid in hostage situations.
Well, I misread your statement regarding that you didn't see the hostage (done homework now for a while, starting to see double, lol).
I still see your move of NOT taking down your gun after you had taken the shot to be wrong. They were saying to put it down, and police DO infact but their gun down when the situation is risky enough. IRL the hostage could have stabbed the Seargent and used him as protection. GMOD doesn't allow this, but I'm just thinking out of the box here.
The other SRU agent were already dealt with, as he started to walk down the stairs. I do not have footage of it, but he stepped in during my "hostage" situation, and they told him to back off and so he did. He didn't take a shot or so. He realised that you can't do this;
Rules ยง 6;5 Wrote:If you are a government official, and you receive word of a hostage situation, do not run straight in and shoot randomly.
I'm look apart of your "shooting randomly" of course, since you did that on accident. It was pure reflection, I understand that now as you claimed you didn't see me. But yet, you could have told him to take it down. Guns vs Knife, would mostly end up in you killing him. So you did have the advantage, but that's not what this is about.
It's up to an admin to decide whether this was valid or not, obviously. I simply see this as a rule breakage and not valid, but as I stated, I might be wrong.
[/quote]
If a person was surrounded, had a knife at a persons throat and was blocked from leaving the only option he has is surrendering, anything hostile towards the hostage would mean the hostage takers life would be over in seconds. I stand by my action of not putting my weapon down. It would've put more lives at risk and that's the main thing to avoid in hostage situations.