Posts: 2,165
Threads: 120
Likes Received: 896 in 577 posts
Likes Given: 1,776
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
52
Country:
10-14-2019, 06:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(10-14-2019, 05:56 PM)Dimitris Wrote: (10-14-2019, 05:50 PM)Conn Wrote: (10-14-2019, 05:46 PM)mintblackbeard Wrote: (10-14-2019, 04:05 PM)Mist Wrote: "Should casinos be banned from the game"
51% says yes. While only 38% said no. Rest said maybe...
Why tho? It has proven to be a great factor that increases players' activity and over-all RP. Wonder how much a change in this will affect the server.
This part of the survey appears heavily influenced by spamming and (likely ) bots. With a quick count, I see around 75 entries with exclusively yes for this option in large groups with around 10 seconds between each entry and only voting in this or in this and the ban wipe vote.
With these removed, you would get a significantly different result. About 57% voted no when they’re removed
What about the ban wipe one? I count 22 with same criteria as I mentioned before.
Gives 30.8% no and 46.7% yes for ban wipe. This is much less affected and same result but IDK how staff are checking for botting here.
Posts: 1,871
Threads: 108
Likes Received: 574 in 472 posts
Likes Given: 1,131
Joined: Jan 2016
Country:
10-14-2019, 06:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(10-14-2019, 06:07 PM)Grizzly Wrote: (10-14-2019, 05:56 PM)Dimitris Wrote: (10-14-2019, 05:50 PM)Conn Wrote: (10-14-2019, 05:46 PM)mintblackbeard Wrote: (10-14-2019, 04:05 PM)Mist Wrote: "Should casinos be banned from the game"
51% says yes. While only 38% said no. Rest said maybe...
Why tho? It has proven to be a great factor that increases players' activity and over-all RP. Wonder how much a change in this will affect the server.
This part of the survey appears heavily influenced by spamming and (likely ) bots. With a quick count, I see around 75 entries with exclusively yes for this option in large groups with around 10 seconds between each entry and only voting in this or in this and the ban wipe vote.
With these removed, you would get a significantly different result. About 57% voted no when they’re removed
What about the ban wipe one?
Ban wipe doesn't seem to be bot influenced at all tbh
Yea, I also think it's the right call so I am glad to see that it has a high chance to happen now.
Posts: 2,165
Threads: 120
Likes Received: 896 in 577 posts
Likes Given: 1,776
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
52
Country:
10-14-2019, 06:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(10-14-2019, 05:46 PM)mintblackbeard Wrote: -SNIP-
Recounting I've counted 80 that vote only in the casino option and by deleting them from a copy of the spreadsheet gives the following graph:
Compared to the original:
Posts: 715
Threads: 23
Likes Received: 442 in 306 posts
Likes Given: 871
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation:
15
Country:
10-14-2019, 06:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(10-14-2019, 06:25 PM)Dimitris Wrote: (10-14-2019, 06:07 PM)Grizzly Wrote: (10-14-2019, 05:56 PM)Dimitris Wrote: (10-14-2019, 05:50 PM)Conn Wrote: (10-14-2019, 05:46 PM)mintblackbeard Wrote: This part of the survey appears heavily influenced by spamming and (likely ) bots. With a quick count, I see around 75 entries with exclusively yes for this option in large groups with around 10 seconds between each entry and only voting in this or in this and the ban wipe vote.
With these removed, you would get a significantly different result. About 57% voted no when they’re removed
What about the ban wipe one?
Ban wipe doesn't seem to be bot influenced at all tbh
Yea, I also think it's the right call so I am glad to see that it has a high chance to happen now.
Overlooking it there is 24 bots that only voted on those two, but still mint said it best, it doesn't affect it at all
Posts: 1,372
Threads: 119
Likes Received: 840 in 484 posts
Likes Given: 421
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
32
Country:
10-14-2019, 08:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 5 times in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Posts: 1,372
Threads: 119
Likes Received: 840 in 484 posts
Likes Given: 421
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
32
Country:
10-14-2019, 09:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(10-14-2019, 01:33 PM)SoulRipper Wrote: (10-14-2019, 01:31 PM)Pollux Wrote: 284 responses? Almost like you could fill it in however many times you want... True, not all 284 responses are legit. Some of them are trolls. However, the vast majority of information is useful.
If it would be 200 responses it would already be a lot. Just mainly read what people wrote, and you'll get the main idea and see the bigger picture.
Some of the responses that came to my attention were problems for years (the clans and the guidelines behind them)
Posts: 3,124
Threads: 251
Likes Received: 1,569 in 1,187 posts
Likes Given: 2,947
Joined: Sep 2016
Reputation:
32
Country:
10-14-2019, 09:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
man, it's a simple command to do IP checks or anything that would stop people from double-voting yet apparently that was too hard. just shows the exact problem in FL, which is how much Soul (doesn't) care about the community
Have I helped you or am I friendly?
+rep
Posts: 1,372
Threads: 119
Likes Received: 840 in 484 posts
Likes Given: 421
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation:
32
Country:
10-14-2019, 09:27 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(10-14-2019, 09:16 PM)Archer Wrote: man, it's a simple command to do IP checks or anything that would stop people from double-voting yet apparently that was too hard. just shows the exact problem in FL, which is how much Soul (doesn't) care about the community I think he naively trusted the community from double voting and other troll comments
When I was working in a survey last year with the help of Yonno and Grapefruit, my biggest concern was that there wouldn't be too many participants because of the requirement for logging in with Google, there will always be people that are going to be concerned about privacy although the editor will never have access to their information
Posts: 5,968
Threads: 219
Likes Received: 2,631 in 1,573 posts
Likes Given: 2,526
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
47
Country:
10-14-2019, 09:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
(10-14-2019, 09:16 PM)Archer Wrote: man, it's a simple command to do IP checks or anything that would stop people from double-voting yet apparently that was too hard. just shows the exact problem in FL, which is how much Soul (doesn't) care about the community (10-14-2019, 09:07 PM)MasterNoda Wrote: What a garbage survey. Skewed results, shit questions/answers, quantitative questions being given an "other" option, and loads of people taking the survey multiple times. Outstanding.
It's not that hard to remove spam, you can check for repetitions and what doesn't have any arguments or relevant text in the answers that are not checkboxes. It is literally IN an excel spreadsheet and can be done within a short 20 minutes.
The data is not useless, is the obvious point.
Visit my profile here.
Posts: 5,968
Threads: 219
Likes Received: 2,631 in 1,573 posts
Likes Given: 2,526
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation:
47
Country:
10-14-2019, 10:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 2 times in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
I will have quite my fun with this. I'll see if I can take up some points that have been argued for.
Visit my profile here.
|