UBR

Fearless Community

Your name: (Steam friends name)GHOSTK1LL3R
Your ban ID: (Number of the ban, this could be 2779 for example)
59414
Banned by: (Please use the staff member's full name with [FL]/[FL:M] tag)
Temar
Reason: (Why were you banned, what is listed as the reason?)
Double accounting
Involved: (Who was involved? Type a - when there were no other people involved except you and the staff member.)
Myself, Narc
Why we should unban you: (A motivation why we should unban you, or why your ban should be shortened)
Narc went through my case and found I didn't double account and that I was holding a lan party with my mate. This can be proven by asking him(Narc).

**SoulRipper**

Insufficient evidence, unbanned.

**Enzyme**

Ban reinstated till investigation has ended.

**General Rickets**

I recommend putting more effort into your UBR.

Fearless Community

It's pretty simple, didn't double account. Narc reviewed the case at the time and asked the same questions and found I was telling the truth. Unless new evidence has presented itself of me 'double accounting' (of which I know for a fact hasn't happened as it's not possible) then there is no reason for this ban to be placed.

**Enzyme**

We will not unban you unless you provide reliable evidence to prove your innocence. A statement from a demoted admin will not lead to you being unbanned.

You got 24 hours to put effort into your UBR and provide evidence or this will be denied.

Fearless Community

(03-31-2015, 10:20 PM)Enzyme Wrote: We will not unban you unless you provide reliable evidence to prove your innocence. A statement from a demoted admin will not lead to you being unbanned.

You got 24 hours to put effort into your UBR and provide evidence or this will be denied.

So you're saying that any bans for a demoted admin are not justified? Ok, can you remove the ban from Narc that I acquired please and everyone elses then because that is what you're saying.

**Temar**

We are not saying that
But things change and trust is lost. So a statement from him now wouldn't prove anything
You have previously mentioned that you was in a pm convo and got unbanned before
That has also been reviewed and we failed to see how that conversation resolved the matter

Fearless Community

That makes zero sense. You're saying that his statement can't prove anything and you say that 'trust is lost' so in fact everyone who was banned from him can appeal their bans because 'a statement from him now wouldn't prove anything'. That is literally WHAT you JUST wrote.

TL;DR: You're manipulating my evidence and making it invalid to keep me banned.

**Temar**

I haven't manipulated anything and how about you talk normal instead of constantly trying to twist everything and annoy everyone
We don't mean what you try to twist it too and it isn't helping your case