Posts: 110
Threads: 29
Likes Received: 4 in 4 posts
Likes Given: 2
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation:
1
01-12-2020, 01:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Can you provide evidence of who spoke to who metagaming here also provide where metagaming was used. The only infomation that was said ware rules being broken that is an OOC matter.
I'd also like to point out that is a copyright infringement stealing someone elses video and reuploading that as your own so that will be dealt with separately.
Posts: 920
Threads: 90
Likes Received: 744 in 286 posts
Likes Given: 840
Joined: Sep 2019
Reputation:
17
Country:
01-12-2020, 01:21 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Hey there!
I struggle to see the metagaming in this video. It would be metagaming if one of us for example were about to get arrested and asked to get picked up while handcuffed. Everything said here could easily be said through PM, you cant use PM in the example I gave you which is why it would be counted as Metagaming, not this.
01-13-2020, 08:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Hello,
You have 24 hours to provide accurate evidence, otherwise, this will be denied as there's no actual proof on that these individuals were metagaming and affecting the outcome of the situation.
Posts: 1,871
Threads: 108
Likes Received: 574 in 472 posts
Likes Given: 1,131
Joined: Jan 2016
Country:
01-14-2020, 04:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Hello Kevin,
You can literally hear them in the video sharing information like, " I'm getting arrested " and " The president is out without security " such information could affect the outcome of 2 different situations at the time. I do not have any other evidence.
Posts: 920
Threads: 90
Likes Received: 744 in 286 posts
Likes Given: 840
Joined: Sep 2019
Reputation:
17
Country:
01-14-2020, 08:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:08 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Hello there.
I still struggle to see the metagaming. The information about the president could've easily been PMed. I'd also like to point out that it wasn't said in purpose to go and actually kill him, it was only a statement stating that the president was doing something risky being outside with 40% tax, it's not a secret that people tend to almost instantly kill a president with 40% tax. "The president is outside with 40% tax, how has he not been killed yet?"
If you listen to what's being said he's saying "Oh, he's rearresting you". They were near eachother at this time and actually saw this in-game. So no, there's no metagaming happening here either.