Posts: 5,176
Threads: 150
Likes Received: 3,643 in 1,767 posts
Likes Given: 2,715
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
105
Country:
08-19-2017, 03:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Hi Nazagruly,
Unfortunately the evidence you have provided wouldn't be sufficient to prove the reported user guilty, we can't see if a raid was active and if the prop was used to gain access to anything purposely blocked off.
Can you try to update the evidence if you have any more. If not, I'm afraid I will have to deny this PR.
Posts: 5,176
Threads: 150
Likes Received: 3,643 in 1,767 posts
Likes Given: 2,715
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
105
Country:
08-20-2017, 08:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Denied
Concluding notes
Regardless of the video proof from Qannter I'm comfortable with denying this PR based on the proof provided and the given statement from the reported user. Insufficient evidence to show the reported claim.
Thank you.