Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
12-29-2018, 11:18 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
In real life, government equipment would be funded by taxpayers etc.
Maybe taking equipment from the locker could take a toll on your salary, but whilst also providing the option to self-supply without this salary reduction.
By allowing government officials to self-supply their gear they are more likely to choose a gun they prefer that may not be in the armoury and therefore be less reckless.
Another possibility is making them pay for ammunition. They lose the ammo they purchase upon death.
Perhaps we could give the president a set salary and instead, tax is something they have to manage: If expenses (government equipment) outweigh the total income then there could be some sort of punish such as being raidable or something.
Maybe taking equipment from the locker could take a toll on your salary, but whilst also providing the option to self-supply without this salary reduction.
By allowing government officials to self-supply their gear they are more likely to choose a gun they prefer that may not be in the armoury and therefore be less reckless.
Another possibility is making them pay for ammunition. They lose the ammo they purchase upon death.
Perhaps we could give the president a set salary and instead, tax is something they have to manage: If expenses (government equipment) outweigh the total income then there could be some sort of punish such as being raidable or something.