Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
08-22-2018, 05:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:07 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
(08-22-2018, 03:05 PM)_Enzyme_ Wrote: Dear DVN,
There shall be no conflict within the government. A cop stopping someone for running a red light is understandably, but not under the consequences that you did it. Ramming someones vehicle for running a red light is a very obvious FailRP case. When you then realize it's your superiours that you are stopping, even worse, the rulers of your city/country, then you most definitely don't pull out heavy firearms and give orders. This is to everyone a simple FailRP case, even if it isn't for you. I understand that you need to defend yourself for your rulebreakings but this will not hold it.
As for the kicking. You used your admin privileges to demote a sitting president. You then decide to take his place which proves that you demoted the sitting president to take his job slot. Your defence against this is "Anyone could of taken the place". That doesn't matter at all. What matters is that you demoted the president to then take his job.
Sincerely,
Enzyme
There was no FailRP in that situation, this is something all 3 of you are claiming because 'it doesn't happen in real life'. I did not demote the President Enzyme, I kicked Frozen because he was flaming OOC in regards to his friend being banned which he should not have done. Firearms HAD to be drawn to initiate FearRP, this in in relation to this rule: 3.5 You must follow FearRP by acting afraid of threatening situations that affect your own or accomplices' lives. To initiate FearRP have a weapon out and give out orders (text or voice). You have stated I demoted the President 3 times in your reply which makes me question how much you understand this situation and if this report is a quick way to attempt to get back at me after we had an IC argument as officers. My defence still stands, anyone could have taken that spot as the whole server receives that notification, not to mention I had to go through the same process as everyone else it's not like a set myself as President with my powers.
(08-22-2018, 03:52 PM)Oneshott Wrote: The only thing id have to add to what enzyme said is to reiterate that DURING that failRP of being a cop i got a 4 day ban for pointing this out and it being claimed as breaking FearRP, even after roleplaying it in character but just being shouted over. Other than that id say that enzyme has it accurately portrayed.
You got a 4 day ban for FearRP as well as insulting a community member after your comment towards me, I just forgot to add that to the ban reason. For some reason you keep forgetting to add this even though you've acknowledged you made a comment towards me that was insulting. Strange.
(08-22-2018, 04:20 PM)[FL:RP]Fro[Z]en Wrote: Enzyme pretty much summed it up. DVN seems to have essentially admitted to FailRP within the comments of this AA and the UBR on Oneshott, and then also used his admin priviliges to take my job. Thanks Enzyme for posting and summing this up pretty well. Let's hope it gets resolved now
'Essentially admitted FailRP' - Essentially? Did I admit to it or not? There has been no FailRP, just because it doesn't happen in real life does not mean it cannot happen in a semi-serious roleplay server.