Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
06-04-2018, 09:53 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:06 AM by Fearless Community. Edited 1 time in total.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
A little conclusion as to what I've established as fact in this PR:
The whole point of metagaming is to use OOC information IC. However, I did not do such a thing as not only did I already know that the police were coming down into the jails, but even if I did not, I chose to ignore the steam message. There is no way to my knowledge that you can disable steam chat overlay and therefore I cannot stop others to message me whenever they'd like. The video shows that I did not open steam nor continue a conversation to initiate metagaming. I am in no control over what others decide to do.
I already was equipped with the knowledge that the police were coming down into jails and therefore no metagaming took place, in my eyes, and the definition implies that I must not have known said information prior to an OOC message being sent since by definition, metagaming can only take place when OOC information is used IC. If I already knew said information IC, which the video proves, not only did I not metagame, but I also believe Felton didn't as he simply tried to initiate an OOC conversation over steam as we are good friends. However, I could not reply due to the unfortunate circumstances that took place IC which includes yourself breaking FearRP.
By cutting out the most crucial part of the case, you have clearly tampered with evidence with the malicious attempt to only show one side of the story to purposefully get me banned. Denying this is simply lying in the courthouse, and you will be digging yourself a deep hole. By doing this, you have committed a serious courthouse rule infringement by cutting the only part of the evidence which is detrimental for my defense, and now you are attempting to lie about it. I'm going to let you act in a mature manner you should and apologize, and perhaps you may even get away with a more lenient punishment.
No metagaming took place, which the full evidence that I posted clearly proves since by definition, metagaming can only take place when OOC information is used IC.
To reiterate, if I already knew said information IC, which the video proves, not only did I not metagame, but I also believe Felton didn't as he simply tried to initiate an OOC conversation over steam as we are good friends. However, I could not reply due to the unfortunate circumstances that took place IC which includes yourself breaking FearRP.
The full video before you tampered with it simply proves that not only did Felton and I not break a single rule, however, you did. And that's the simple truth of this ridiculous matter. Here is a spoiler containing said non-tampered evidence:
EDIT:
The untampered evidence simply proves that no metagaming took place and that I knew the entire time that the police were coming down into jails since I sent a request in regards to that way before any steam message was sent by Felton. All he was trying to do in my eyes was start a conversation OOC with no intent to bring anything IC since I knew everything.
The points I have made in this post are backed up by the untampered evidence. Everything I said is true, and that's it.
No one metagamed, and the only people to have broken a rule is KA34/Aspire by both lying here in the courthouse and then tampering with the evidence with the intent to mislead.
The whole point of metagaming is to use OOC information IC. However, I did not do such a thing as not only did I already know that the police were coming down into the jails, but even if I did not, I chose to ignore the steam message. There is no way to my knowledge that you can disable steam chat overlay and therefore I cannot stop others to message me whenever they'd like. The video shows that I did not open steam nor continue a conversation to initiate metagaming. I am in no control over what others decide to do.
I already was equipped with the knowledge that the police were coming down into jails and therefore no metagaming took place, in my eyes, and the definition implies that I must not have known said information prior to an OOC message being sent since by definition, metagaming can only take place when OOC information is used IC. If I already knew said information IC, which the video proves, not only did I not metagame, but I also believe Felton didn't as he simply tried to initiate an OOC conversation over steam as we are good friends. However, I could not reply due to the unfortunate circumstances that took place IC which includes yourself breaking FearRP.
By cutting out the most crucial part of the case, you have clearly tampered with evidence with the malicious attempt to only show one side of the story to purposefully get me banned. Denying this is simply lying in the courthouse, and you will be digging yourself a deep hole. By doing this, you have committed a serious courthouse rule infringement by cutting the only part of the evidence which is detrimental for my defense, and now you are attempting to lie about it. I'm going to let you act in a mature manner you should and apologize, and perhaps you may even get away with a more lenient punishment.
No metagaming took place, which the full evidence that I posted clearly proves since by definition, metagaming can only take place when OOC information is used IC.
To reiterate, if I already knew said information IC, which the video proves, not only did I not metagame, but I also believe Felton didn't as he simply tried to initiate an OOC conversation over steam as we are good friends. However, I could not reply due to the unfortunate circumstances that took place IC which includes yourself breaking FearRP.
The full video before you tampered with it simply proves that not only did Felton and I not break a single rule, however, you did. And that's the simple truth of this ridiculous matter. Here is a spoiler containing said non-tampered evidence:
Spoiler :
EDIT:
The untampered evidence simply proves that no metagaming took place and that I knew the entire time that the police were coming down into jails since I sent a request in regards to that way before any steam message was sent by Felton. All he was trying to do in my eyes was start a conversation OOC with no intent to bring anything IC since I knew everything.
The points I have made in this post are backed up by the untampered evidence. Everything I said is true, and that's it.
No one metagamed, and the only people to have broken a rule is KA34/Aspire by both lying here in the courthouse and then tampering with the evidence with the intent to mislead.
Kind Regards,
![[Image: 2tVFym3.png]](https://i.imgur.com/2tVFym3.png)