[Report] 4 Players
#8
(03-11-2016, 11:03 PM)Paddington Bear Wrote: Posting as Rupert Bear - Involved.

(03-11-2016, 10:31 PM)Pedo Bear Wrote: He has just stated that it was a misclick..


Also i dont understand why you felt the need to disrupt out passiveRP with your stupid games. Also i do believe you and nick (Yogi) have a personal Vendetta and you are trying to get back at him by pissing him off and not leaving him alone!

I'm sorry but he never stated or said anything to tell us it was a misclick - at that point in time give me any evidence/information on how we could've known it was a misclick. We wouldn't have thrown that Molotov otherwise. The head of our Mafia was assaulted by your Security Guard (from our perspective). So, logically, we would retaliate, in this case by burning down your store/food bank. Furthermore we have no "Vendetta" against Yogi, why would we? I can't understand what would make us dislike him. You have no evidence for this claim and are just piling on excuses. Because I cannot think of any other reason myself (or any of us for that matter) why we would dislike Yogi.



And I'm not sure how or why being in a skype call prevents us from playing without breaking a rule. What does that prove? Why does Fearless have a TeamSpeak server. Is everyone on that chat server also breaking a rule? I think not. You have insufficient proof for all of the above claims.

(03-11-2016, 10:34 PM)-Reece- Wrote: We know it was sorted out by them, that was only the arrests though - that still doesn't make it okay.

Plus, you kept metagaming in-game to get people to come and try and shut our PassiveRP down; also, you constantly got new SRUs and Police to come to us which was unfair as we were trying to RP and you kept telling people to arrest us. You demoted another Police Officer for unarresting us whilst (s)he saw the whole situation.

Anyway, lets not start a flame war.

Again, please explain how we metagamed.

Paddington was sending SRU to your store BECAUSE you were breaking a law. Which seems logical. And then after you changed your store to a Food Bank or whatever you want to call it. We stopped (excluding the time Baloo Bear appeared, however that was because he had only just joined and was sent there by Paddington; he wasn't informed that they had changed into a Food Bank). And that Police Officer was demoted for the obvious reason - unarresting you. And if the reason for the unarrest was because (s)he thought we were breaking server rules, correct me if I'm wrong but isn't that backseat administration.
i doubt the reason you molotoved our house was because of my misclick because 1. it was obvious it was a miss click. 2. you pulled it out as soon as i hit you 3.you can even see him not react before or after because he was in his menu getting out the molotov. leading me to believe he was going to molotov the store anyway. from the video you can clearly see they where just there to cause trouble through mugging us (on main street) and/or molotoving us if we didnt pay. from the video you can also tell that they are extremely mingy and are not taking the jobs seriously.
The next section of your reply states about an inncident that was previously sorted out by other admins.



We must seize the memes of production!![Image: amiity_by_ratatoskrr1-dapwu5z.png]


Messages In This Thread
[Report] 4 Players - by Ratatoskrr - 03-11-2016, 09:52 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by Amiity - 03-11-2016, 10:02 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by -Reece- - 03-11-2016, 10:03 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by ITsM4x - 03-11-2016, 10:28 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by Ratatoskrr - 03-11-2016, 10:31 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by -Reece- - 03-11-2016, 10:34 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by ITsM4x - 03-11-2016, 11:03 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by Amiity - 03-13-2016, 10:11 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by ITsM4x - 03-13-2016, 10:22 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by Agorith - 03-14-2016, 12:23 PM
RE: [Report] 4 Players - by Rylund - 03-14-2016, 02:04 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)