Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
02-18-2016, 07:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Fixed Encoding
)
Hello.
As my previous case was mentioned, I wanted to poke my head in for a moment to clarify something, then I'll show myself the door. I believe my two cents will prove vital to the verdict so it should be listened too, even if remotely.
Clementio has a point with my case. The angles are the same and overall your back is exposed in roughly the same proportions in both cases.
With this in mind, Theo, the base defender in my case, admitted in person, with logs to prove it that he was wrong in his construction to build such a base. The key part here is that enzyme, the previous sa and person in charge of my case, mentioned that theo stated this.
This proves without a shadow of a doubt that theo was wrong, but fixed it, which is why he was let go without a hitch. With this in comparison to the current case, there's a clear correlation here.
The reason why my case was posted is because enzyme said that part of the base is OK when theo said he would fix it. Given the base in question here wasn't fixed, according to the previous ruling, from an sa to boot, it's illegal, and Falcao should have stepped in.
As my previous case was mentioned, I wanted to poke my head in for a moment to clarify something, then I'll show myself the door. I believe my two cents will prove vital to the verdict so it should be listened too, even if remotely.
Clementio has a point with my case. The angles are the same and overall your back is exposed in roughly the same proportions in both cases.
With this in mind, Theo, the base defender in my case, admitted in person, with logs to prove it that he was wrong in his construction to build such a base. The key part here is that enzyme, the previous sa and person in charge of my case, mentioned that theo stated this.
This proves without a shadow of a doubt that theo was wrong, but fixed it, which is why he was let go without a hitch. With this in comparison to the current case, there's a clear correlation here.
The reason why my case was posted is because enzyme said that part of the base is OK when theo said he would fix it. Given the base in question here wasn't fixed, according to the previous ruling, from an sa to boot, it's illegal, and Falcao should have stepped in.