[FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1
#38
(02-06-2016, 02:24 PM)Hitman Wrote: I am not going to stay away from the case unless told otherwise by a superior. I have every right to post here. And yes I think this case is sad. I am allowed to post my opinion being an administrator.

No need to worry about "bias" as administrators do not make decisions in these cases. That is a super-admin and above's job.

Hitman
Fearless Administrator

Then can you stop making the decisions of who is allowed to post on here then? As you said yourself 'No need to worry about "bias" as administrators do not make decisions in these cases. That is a super-admin and above's job.'


Messages In This Thread
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-04-2016, 09:23 AM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-05-2016, 07:24 PM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-06-2016, 08:15 AM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-06-2016, 09:19 AM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-06-2016, 09:37 AM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-06-2016, 02:03 PM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-06-2016, 02:11 PM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-06-2016, 02:19 PM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-06-2016, 02:24 PM
RE: [FL] Nighthawk's alteration of the rules pt.1 - by User 12049 - 02-06-2016, 02:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)