Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
02-06-2016, 09:12 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
As it was also explained, admins have permissions to edit anything they want by system, they do not have permission from Soul to change whatever they want, as it's an SA level action at minimum. That's not being dishonest, that's bad wording at best.
Again, it's impossible to determine a before and after edit using two images from separate areas of the forums. One area may have been reverted where another had not. That is a staff oversight. If you cannot properly form a timeline then it's just hearsay till someone investigates how far back they can dig into forum history.
Also, Nighthawkd never actually said he didn't have access to make an edit, he said very specifically that he started an edit and Soul spoke with him. Soul confirmed nothing was changed by Nighthawkd's specific edit. It's the first reply to your link and you even posted an image of it.
To sum it up:
Your evidence is inconclusive as it's not from the same thread, but a different subforum entirely
Soul already confirmed that no edit took place
I'm the person who added perm ban at request of SA Killjoy
And the claim that he lied about not having access is false as he never said that. It's not that he can't edit by ability, but at request of the Owner.
I'm not seeing how this Abuse case is still open for debate. There is no case remaining in the original post and now it's just a game of finding a new reason to try to get this to continue. To be perfectly clear, the claim that he made any actual edit was debunked before I even stepped up to say anything, as Nighthawkd already stated before this began that Soul already confirmed no edit too place. An edit stamp doesn't mean that an edit actually took place, it just means that someone started an edit and finished it. Weather or not any information was changed, there will still be an edit stamp.
If you could please, for the third or fourth time now, update your images to show the same thread before and after so it can be clearly established as evidence. If not, it's still tampering with evidence in the courthouse to attempt to sway opinion, not actual fact.
Again, it's impossible to determine a before and after edit using two images from separate areas of the forums. One area may have been reverted where another had not. That is a staff oversight. If you cannot properly form a timeline then it's just hearsay till someone investigates how far back they can dig into forum history.
Also, Nighthawkd never actually said he didn't have access to make an edit, he said very specifically that he started an edit and Soul spoke with him. Soul confirmed nothing was changed by Nighthawkd's specific edit. It's the first reply to your link and you even posted an image of it.
To sum it up:
Your evidence is inconclusive as it's not from the same thread, but a different subforum entirely
Soul already confirmed that no edit took place
I'm the person who added perm ban at request of SA Killjoy
And the claim that he lied about not having access is false as he never said that. It's not that he can't edit by ability, but at request of the Owner.
I'm not seeing how this Abuse case is still open for debate. There is no case remaining in the original post and now it's just a game of finding a new reason to try to get this to continue. To be perfectly clear, the claim that he made any actual edit was debunked before I even stepped up to say anything, as Nighthawkd already stated before this began that Soul already confirmed no edit too place. An edit stamp doesn't mean that an edit actually took place, it just means that someone started an edit and finished it. Weather or not any information was changed, there will still be an edit stamp.
If you could please, for the third or fourth time now, update your images to show the same thread before and after so it can be clearly established as evidence. If not, it's still tampering with evidence in the courthouse to attempt to sway opinion, not actual fact.