Character
Rules
Events
Map
RP Points
Proplimits
Statistics
Steam Group
Members
Hall of Fame
Team
Bans
Blacklists
Warnings
Changelog
Content
01-17-2016, 10:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-01-2022, 01:04 AM by Fearless Community.
Edit Reason: Checked Encoding
)
Nighthawkd is an administrator, not a super moderator. I'm not going to reveal the system, it's ranks, and explain how he was able to perform the edit. (Hint, admins can edit any post, part of admin powers, take off tin hats). However I'm wondering when you guys are going to put up new evidence. Allow me to repeat.
Your evidence about his edit has already been invalidated.
The edit you guys have tried to accuse him of making, I did years ago.
The evidence present was also "mishandled" or "mispresented".
Now instead of fixing that major hole, you guys are trying to get to the bottom of who is lying. Since I was an administrator when I performed my edit, obviously any admin CAN edit those posts. An admin is required to have PERMISSION to edit the post, but has the PERMISSIONS to edit it. Do you see what I'm getting at? The system lets you edit, the boss doesn't, and for good reason I might add.
Trying to hinge your case, on a minor wording problem, AFTER the primary foundation for your case has been debunked, is clutching at straws. If you do not have a case to stand on, don't try to build a new one here, go collect yourselves and make a new one properly.
P.S. Still waiting on Soul to do something with this, as he has no remaining SA team at this point this case could sit here a while. I encourage you to use the time you have to either present new evidence as you said you would, or wait till my claim gets investigated, found to be true backed by logs, and this case gets thrown right into the trashcan. Different issues require different threads, much like how ban reports require you to make a new one per person.
Your evidence about his edit has already been invalidated.
The edit you guys have tried to accuse him of making, I did years ago.
The evidence present was also "mishandled" or "mispresented".
Now instead of fixing that major hole, you guys are trying to get to the bottom of who is lying. Since I was an administrator when I performed my edit, obviously any admin CAN edit those posts. An admin is required to have PERMISSION to edit the post, but has the PERMISSIONS to edit it. Do you see what I'm getting at? The system lets you edit, the boss doesn't, and for good reason I might add.
Trying to hinge your case, on a minor wording problem, AFTER the primary foundation for your case has been debunked, is clutching at straws. If you do not have a case to stand on, don't try to build a new one here, go collect yourselves and make a new one properly.
P.S. Still waiting on Soul to do something with this, as he has no remaining SA team at this point this case could sit here a while. I encourage you to use the time you have to either present new evidence as you said you would, or wait till my claim gets investigated, found to be true backed by logs, and this case gets thrown right into the trashcan. Different issues require different threads, much like how ban reports require you to make a new one per person.