Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd
#43
(01-08-2016, 02:44 AM)Operation Wrote:
(01-07-2016, 10:16 PM)Avgar Wrote:
(01-07-2016, 09:04 PM)[FL:RP] Mike Wrote: I do not have faith that Grub will fairly oversee the case.

You ought to PM SoulRipper instead if you feel that way.

Your end goal is, or I assume is, to have something done about the administrator in question. In order for something substantial to be done it has to be brought to the SA or Owner.

I also feel Grub will not deal with the case fair, nor SoulRipper, as they're both known to have bias.

Just to address this as plain as I can. If you feel the OWNER is biased, why do you even bother here anymore? You expecting a demotion out of him? Because your logic there breaks, no staff beneath him could be trusted at that point because at the end of the day, he can be the final word.

I used to blame Soul for my problems too, but at the end of the day, Soul keeps this place going. When the staff split and a lot of you people came out "doomsaying", this place survived. It's survived years, staff splits, community splits, and the thousands of extremely toxic players that have come here. If you honestly feel you can't go to the people in charge because they won't help you due to bias, the only remaining option is to leave.

Don't cling to false hope that you will change or get the owner demoted, that's not going to happen. Soul isn't even a bad dude, biggest complaint on him that actually sticks is that he generally doesn't get involved in administrative punishments unless directly contacted. How he spends his money, what he does with his time, who he prefers to speak with, it's all hearsay.


Messages In This Thread
Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 05:08 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 05:14 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 05:43 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 05:49 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 05:55 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 06:01 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 06:11 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Ali - 01-07-2016, 06:41 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Reebs - 01-07-2016, 07:30 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Avgar - 01-07-2016, 08:58 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 09:04 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Avgar - 01-07-2016, 10:16 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Gog - 01-07-2016, 09:09 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Decay - 01-07-2016, 09:54 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 10:39 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 10:48 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-07-2016, 10:52 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Ali - 01-08-2016, 12:03 AM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Marty - 01-08-2016, 03:19 AM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Old Man Jokhah - 01-08-2016, 03:26 AM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by DVN - 01-08-2016, 11:14 AM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-08-2016, 02:49 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Nuka - 01-08-2016, 04:14 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-08-2016, 05:03 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-08-2016, 05:47 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-08-2016, 06:00 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Mike - 01-08-2016, 06:04 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by MrSir - 01-08-2016, 06:09 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Grub - 01-08-2016, 06:30 PM
RE: Opinions regarding [FL] NightHawkd - by Grub - 01-08-2016, 06:36 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)