Should this case be re-opened as Suarez is now a moderator again?

[Awestruck]

With the case you're all pointing to where awestruck had to provide evidence that was because he had evidence and was being extremely nitpicky about uploading it (messing the staff around for 15 pages). I don't record my game unlike awestruck and I have no evidence to post.

We also work on a innocent unless proven guilty basis. Not the other way round.

I don't think I've ever come out with a statement saying that I always record, as such a statement would be untrue. Also, I never stated in my Ban Request that I had evidence.

''We also work on a innocent unless proven guilty basis. Not the other way round.''

You say this, yet GHOSTK1LL3R and I were required to upload evidence showing my own wrong doing? Why would I prove myself guilty? It makes 0 sense. 

''innocent unless proven guilty''

Yes, until proven guilty by the accusers. Not proven guilty by myself. We were forced into submission and threatened with punishments if we didn't incriminate myself... Seems legit to me.


[Image: 4cdd42a9da.png]


Now. Back to the topic at hand. Your case.