Report: [FL:RP] Awestruck

[Awestruck]

Please may I remind you that the case in question is on me has no relevance to GHOSTK1LL3R at all since I am the one who unintentionally fired shots resulting in the damage to another player who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Any evidence that GHOSTK1LL3R could have provided would have made absolutely no difference to the case.

Your reply has not concluded anything and is totally unnecessary. I believe that if evidence isn't provided by the person who is trying to fight their case and not get banned, then they should be banned for their crime in question. Therefore, technically GHOSTK1LL3R doesn't have to prove anything to anyone as I am the person who has been accused. This is why I've been saying that the accuser needs to provide the evidence... If I really wanted to, I could have said at the start that there was no evidence and you would have never known. The case would have been denied as it originally was for lack of evidence by the accuser. This is how it works:

The accuser provides solid evidence of the defendant carrying out the said rule breakage otherwise the case should be closed due to lack of evidence. If solid evidence is provided by the accuser, the defendant has the choice of whether to defend himself with his own evidence showing ONLY the breakage of rule/s that he has been accused of.

This case has turned into a complete shit-fest and pretty much every principle of ban requests has gone out the window. If anyone should be getting banned at all, it should be me considering that I am the person who has been accused of breaking rules.

Thank you,


AwestruckBullet